Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and anatomic predictors of need for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation.
Desai, Yaanik; Levy, Mathew R; Iravanian, Shahriar; Clermont, Edward C; Kelli, Heval M; Eisner, Robert L; El-Chami, Mikhael F; Leon, Angel R; Delurgio, David B; Merchant, Faisal M.
Affiliation
  • Desai Y; Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
  • Levy MR; Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
  • Iravanian S; Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
  • Clermont EC; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
  • Kelli HM; Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
  • Eisner RL; Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
  • El-Chami MF; Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
  • Leon AR; Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
  • Delurgio DB; Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
  • Merchant FM; Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
World J Cardiol ; 9(9): 742-748, 2017 Sep 26.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29081907
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To identify predictors of need for repeat procedures after initial atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

METHODS:

We identified a cohort undergoing first time AF ablation at our institution from January 2004 to February 2014 who had cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging performed prior to ablation. Clinical variables and anatomic characteristics (determined from CMR) were assessed as predictors of need for repeat ablation. The decision regarding need for and timing of repeat ablation was at the discretion of the treating physician.

RESULTS:

From a cohort of 331 patients, 142 patients (43%) underwent repeat ablation at a mean of 13.6 ± 18.4 mo after the index procedure. Both male gender (81% vs 71%, P = 0.05) and lower ejection fraction (57.4% ± 10.3% vs 59.8% ± 9.4%, P = 0.04) were associated with need for repeat ablation. On pre-ablation CMR, mean pulmonary vein (PV) diameters were significantly larger in all four PVs among patients requiring repeat procedures. In multivariate analysis, increased right superior PV diameter significantly predicted need for repeat ablation (odds ratio 1.08 per millimeter increase in diameter, 95%CI 1.00-1.16, P = 0.05). There were also trends toward significance for increased left and right inferior PV sizes among those requiring repeat procedures.

CONCLUSION:

Increased PV size predicts the need for repeat AF ablation, with each millimeter increase in PV diameter associated with an approximately 5%-10% increased risk of requiring repeat procedures.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: World J Cardiol Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: World J Cardiol Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: