Comparison of computer-aided detection (CADe) capability for pulmonary nodules among standard-, reduced- and ultra-low-dose CTs with and without hybrid type iterative reconstruction technique.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To directly compare the effect of a reconstruction algorithm on nodule detection capability of the computer-aided detection (CADe) system using standard-dose, reduced-dose and ultra-low dose chest CTs with and without adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our institutional review board approved this study, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Standard-, reduced- and ultra-low-dose chest CTs (250 mA, 50 mA and 10 mA) were used to examine 40 patients, 21 males (mean age ±â€¯standard deviation 63.1 ±â€¯11.0 years) and 19 females (mean age, 65.1 ±â€¯12.7 years), and reconstructed as 1 mm-thick sections. Detection of nodule equal to more than 4 mm in dimeter was automatically performed by our proprietary CADe software. The utility of iterative reconstruction method for improving nodule detection capability, sensitivity and false positive rate (/case) of the CADe system using all protocols were compared by means of McNemar's test or signed rank test. RESULTS: Sensitivity (SE 0.43) and false-positive rate (FPR 7.88) of ultra-low-dose CT without AIDR 3D was significantly inferior to those of standard-dose CTs (with AIDR 3D SE, 0.78, p < .0001, FPR, 3.05, p < .0001; and without AIDR 3D SE, 0.80, p < .0001, FPR 2.63, p < .0001), reduced-dose CTs (with AIDR 3D SE, 0.81, p < .0001, FPR, 3.05, p < .0001; and without AIDR 3D SE, 0.62, p < .0001, FPR 2.95, p < .0001) and ultra-low-dose CT with AIDR 3D (SE, 0.79, p < .0001, FPR, 4.88, p = .0001). CONCLUSION: The AIDR 3D has a significant positive effect on nodule detection capability of the CADe system even when radiation dose is reduced.