Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Position paper on current aspects of sponsoring in accredited CME.
Stolz, Daiana; Griebenow, Reinhard; Tichelli, Andre; Ullmann, Andrew J; Costello, Richard W; Michalis, Lampros; Guenova, Margarita; Sutter, Sandy; De Andrade, Fabiola; Schaefer, Robert.
Affiliation
  • Stolz D; on behalf of the European Board for Accreditation in Pneumology (EBAP), Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Griebenow R; Department for Pneumology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Tichelli A; on behalf of the European Board for Accreditation in Cardiology (EBAC), Cologne, Germany.
  • Ullmann AJ; Municipal Hospital Cologne-Merheim, Department II for Internal Medicine II, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Costello RW; on behalf of the European Board for Accreditation in Haematology (EBAH), The Hague, Netherlands.
  • Michalis L; Department for Haematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Guenova M; on behalf of the European Board for Accreditation in Infectious Diseases (EBAID).
  • Sutter S; Department II for Internal Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • De Andrade F; on behalf of the European Board for Accreditation in Pneumology (EBAP), Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Schaefer R; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Education and Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J Eur CME ; 6(1): 1312062, 2017.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29644130
ABSTRACT
This position paper is the result of a collaborative approach of several European Specialty Accreditation Boards (ESABs) and, has been stimulated by their current experience in accreditation regarding roles and responsibilities assumed by sponsors of accredited continuing medical education (CME). The suggestions made in this paper aim to preserve the fundamental principle in CME accreditation that the physician in charge of the programme has sole responsibility for the selection of topics, speakers, content and format, as well as mode of presentation, and that sponsors will under no circumstances interfere with this principle. This is considered as a responsibility of an individual physician (or physicians), which cannot be delegated, even in part, to third parties. This responsibility has been extended to include all communication before and after the event. The paper also identifies undecided issues, about which ESABs are committed to elaborate proposals in the future.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Eur CME Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Eur CME Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: