In the DNA Exoneration Cases, Eyewitness Memory Was Not the Problem: A Reply to Berkowitz and Frenda (2018) and Wade, Nash, and Lindsay (2018). | Perspect Psychol Sci;13(3): 343-345, 2018 05. | MEDLINE

Main content 1 Search 2 Footer 3

+A A -A High contrast

VHL Regional Portal

Information and Knowledge for Health

Advanced Search EVID@Easy

In the DNA Exoneration Cases, Eyewitness Memory Was Not the Problem: A Reply to Berkowitz and Frenda (2018) and Wade, Nash, and Lindsay (2018).

Wixted, John T; Mickes, Laura; Fisher, Ronald P.

Affiliation

Wixted JT; 1 Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego.
Mickes L; 2 Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London.
Fisher RP; 3 Department of Psychology, Florida International University.

Perspect Psychol Sci ; 13(3): 343-345, 2018 05.

Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29716453

Subject(s)
Key words

cognitive interview; confidence and accuracy; eyewitness identification

Search on Google

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: DNA / Memory Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Perspect Psychol Sci Year: 2018 Document type: Article

Search on Google

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: DNA / Memory Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Perspect Psychol Sci Year: 2018 Document type: Article