Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement.
Maloca, Peter M; Studer, Harald P; Ambrósio, Renato; Goldblum, David; Rothenbuehler, Simon; Barthelmes, Daniel; Zweifel, Sandrine; Scholl, Hendrik P N; Balaskas, Konstantinos; Tufail, Adnan; Hasler, Pascal W.
Affiliation
  • Maloca PM; OCTlab, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Studer HP; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Ambrósio R; Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel (IOB), Basel, Switzerland.
  • Goldblum D; Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Rothenbuehler S; OCTlab, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Barthelmes D; Swiss Eye Research Foundation, Reinach, Switzerland.
  • Zweifel S; Department for Ophthalmology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Scholl HPN; Rio de Janeiro Corneal Topography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Balaskas K; Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Tufail A; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Hasler PW; OCTlab, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
PLoS One ; 13(9): e0203884, 2018.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30212550
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate variability of central corneal thickness measurement (CCT) devices using a hitherto unprecedented number of CCT devices.

METHODS:

CCT was measured consecutively in 122 normal corneas of 61 subjects with seven different devices using three distinct measurement technologies Scheimpflug, Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Per device deviation from the mean CCT value per eye was used to determine which of the devices performed best, compared to the mean value.

RESULTS:

Cirrus OCT yielded the lowest deviation. Deviations of the individual devices from the mean CCT of each eye were (OS/OD) 12.8±5.0/14.9±9.4 µm for Topcon noncontact specular microscopy (NCSM), 11.3±5.9/10.6±7.3 µm for Pentacam, 10.7±5.2/10.4±4.8 µm for Spectralis OCT, 6.0±3.9/6.2±4.9 µm for Topcon DRI OCT, 5.1±3.4/5.9±10.3 µm for AngioVue OCT, 4.8±4.1/5.7±4.6 µm for US pachymetry, and 4.2±3.2/5.7±4.6 µm for Cirrus OCT. The maximum differences between US pachymetry and the other devices were very high (up to 120 µm).

CONCLUSION:

Central corneal thickness may be under- or overestimated due to high interdevice variations. Measuring CCT with one device only may lead to inappropriate clinical and surgical recommendations. OCT showed superior results.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ultrasonography / Cornea / Tomography, Optical Coherence / Corneal Pachymetry Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ultrasonography / Cornea / Tomography, Optical Coherence / Corneal Pachymetry Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: