Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating the HEADS-ED Screening Tool in a Hospital-Based Mental Health and Addictions Central Referral Intake System: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Clark, Sharon E; Cloutier, Paula; Polihronis, Christine; Cappelli, Mario.
Affiliation
  • Clark SE; Mental Health and Addiction Services, Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; sharon.clark@iwk.nshealth.ca.
  • Cloutier P; Mental Health Research and.
  • Polihronis C; Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and.
  • Cappelli M; Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and.
Hosp Pediatr ; 9(2): 107-114, 2019 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30692131
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We evaluated the use of a mental health (MH) screening tool in a hospital-based centralized MH referral telephonic intake process. The tool is used to guide psychosocial screening in several domains home; education; activities and peers; drugs and alcohol; suicidality; emotions, thoughts, and behaviors; and discharge resources (HEADS-ED). We wanted to understand the use of the tool to guide next step in care decision-making over the telephone.

METHODS:

Intake workers used the HEADS-ED tool to guide the assessment processes, identified areas of MH need, and made decisions about next step in care. We completed a retrospective chart review of all callers to the intake system over 4 months to gather initial decision at intake and subsequent steps in treatment. χ2 and analysis of variance tests were used to examine differences between HEADS-ED scores and next step in care.

RESULTS:

A total of 674 patients aged 3 to 19 years (mean age = 11.7 years, SD = 0.6; girls = 50.0%) called for services. Significant mean differences were found on total HEADS-ED scores between treatment options (F4,641 = 75.76; P < .001). Decision validity indicated that 86% (n = 506 of 587) of initial referrals matched treatments that were actually received. Uptake of the tool was 100%, and interrater reliability indicated strong agreement between raters (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.82; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

With our results, we support the use of the HEADS-ED tool in a telephone-based MH intake system to help guide the initial assessment and inform decision-making about fit of next step in care, both within the health center-based MH system and in the community.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / Referral and Consultation / Telephone / Telemedicine / Clinical Decision-Making / Mental Disorders / Mental Health Services Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Hosp Pediatr Year: 2019 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / Referral and Consultation / Telephone / Telemedicine / Clinical Decision-Making / Mental Disorders / Mental Health Services Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Hosp Pediatr Year: 2019 Document type: Article