Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Associations between embryo grading and congenital malformations in IVF/ICSI pregnancies.
Abel, Kate; Healey, Martin; Finch, Sue; Osianlis, Tiki; Vollenhoven, Beverley.
Affiliation
  • Abel K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal Women's Hospital, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia. Electronic address: kate_abel@hotmail.com.
  • Healey M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal Women's Hospital, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia; Monash IVF, 252-256 Clayton Road, Clayton VIC 3168, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3010, Australia.
  • Finch S; Statistical Consulting Centre, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, 139 Barry Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia.
  • Osianlis T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia.
  • Vollenhoven B; Monash IVF, 252-256 Clayton Road, Clayton VIC 3168, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia; Women's Programme, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton VIC 3168, Australia.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 39(6): 981-989, 2019 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31606300
ABSTRACT
RESEARCH QUESTION Does the quality of transferred embryos have an impact on the rate of congenital malformations in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)-conceived babies?

DESIGN:

Retrospective cohort study involving 6637 pregnancies of ≥20 weeks' gestation from women undergoing embryo transfer with a single Day 5 embryo at a private multisite IVF clinic between 2005 and 2015. Embryos were classified as good quality (n = 5537) or poor quality (n = 1100) based on an internal grading system of morphological parameters; malformation rates were compared.

RESULTS:

In pregnancies proceeding to delivery (≥20 weeks' gestation), poor quality embryos were associated with increased odds of at least one anomaly (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.71), major anomalies (adjusted OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.05-1.91), musculoskeletal anomalies (adjusted OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.35-3.22), particularly talipes (adjusted OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.33-6.25), and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) classification 'Other congenital malformations' (adjusted OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.13-4.34). Furthermore, for pregnancies ≥9 weeks' gestation, poor embryos had more than double the odds of chromosomal anomalies than good embryos (adjusted OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.30-4.18, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS:

This is the first study to compare the rates of individual congenital malformations for good and poor quality embryos. It provides insight into potential risks of transferring poor quality embryos. In pregnancies ≥20 weeks' gestation, poor quality Day 5 embryos are associated with major malformations, at least one anomaly, musculoskeletal anomalies, talipes and the ICD classification 'Other congenital malformations'. In pregnancies ≥9 weeks' gestation, poor quality Day 5 embryos are associated with chromosomal anomalies.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Congenital Abnormalities / Embryo, Mammalian Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Reprod Biomed Online Journal subject: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Year: 2019 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Congenital Abnormalities / Embryo, Mammalian Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Reprod Biomed Online Journal subject: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Year: 2019 Document type: Article