Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment patterns for metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain.
Aranda, E; Polo, E; Camps, C; Carrato, A; Díaz-Rubio, E; Guillem, V; López, R; Antón, A.
Affiliation
  • Aranda E; Oncology Department, Maimonides Institute of Biomedical Research (IMIBIC), Reina Sofía Hospital, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain. earandaa@seom.org.
  • Polo E; CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. earandaa@seom.org.
  • Camps C; Oncology Dapartment, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Av. Menendez Pidal, s/n, 14004, Córdoba, Spain. earandaa@seom.org.
  • Carrato A; Medical Oncology Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, IIS Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • Díaz-Rubio E; Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Investigación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
  • Guillem V; CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain.
  • López R; Department of Medical Oncology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
  • Antón A; Department of Medicine, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 22(9): 1455-1462, 2020 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31974819
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The primary aim of this retrospective study was to describe the treatment patterns according to the type of treatment received by patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Spain.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective, observational, multicenter study performed by 33 sites throughout Spain that included consecutive patients aged 18 years or older who had received or were receiving treatment for mCRC.

RESULTS:

At the time of inclusion, of the 873 evaluable patients, 507 (58%) had received two lines, 235 (27%) had received three lines, 106 (12%) had received four lines, and the remaining patients had received up to ten lines. The most frequent chemotherapy schemes were the FOLFOX or CAPOX regimens (66%) for first-line treatment, FOLFOX, CAPOX or FOLFIRI (70%) for second-line treatment, and FOLFOX, FOLFIRI or other fluoropyrimidine-based regimens for third- and fourth-line (over 60%) treatment. Sixty percent of patients received targeted therapy as part of their first-line treatment, and this proportion increased up to approximately 70% of patients as part of the second-line of treatment. A relevant proportion of patients were treated with unknown KRAS, and especially the BRAF, mutation statuses.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study reveals inconsistencies regarding adherence to the recommendations of the ESMO guidelines for the management of mCRC in Spain. Improved adherence to the standard practice described in such guidelines for the determination of RAS and BRAF mutation statuses and the use of targeted therapies in first-line treatment should be considered to guarantee that patients can benefit from the best therapeutic approaches available.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Guideline Adherence Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Guideline Adherence Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...