Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Technical Success, Efficacy, and Safety of Portomesenteric Venous Intervention following Nontransplant Hepatobiliary or Pancreatic Surgery.
Mugu, Vamshi K; Thompson, Scott M; Fleming, Chad J; Yohanathan, Lavanya; Truty, Mark J; Kendrick, Michael L; Andrews, James C.
Affiliation
  • Mugu VK; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Electronic address: mugu.vamshi@mayo.edu.
  • Thompson SM; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
  • Fleming CJ; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
  • Yohanathan L; Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
  • Truty MJ; Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
  • Kendrick ML; Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
  • Andrews JC; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(3): 416-424.e2, 2020 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31982317
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate technical success, efficacy and safety of portomesenteric venous (PMV) intervention for PMV stenosis or occlusion following nontransplant hepatobiliary or pancreatic (HPB) surgery. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A retrospective review identified 42 patients (mean age 60 y) with PMV stenosis (n = 33; 79%) or occlusion (n = 9; 21%) who underwent attempted PMV intervention following HPB surgery between June 1, 2011, and April 1, 2018. Main outcomes were technical success, primary patency rates, and complications. Technical success was compared by venous pathology and primary PMV patency based on anticoagulation status after the procedure using Fisher exact test. Rates of primary patency by stent group were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS:

Technical success was 91% (n = 38/42) and significantly higher in patients with stenosis (n = 33/33; 100%) vs occlusion (n = 5/9; 56%) (P = .001). Primary presenting symptom resolved in 28 (87%) patients, including 6 (100%) patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. At mean imaging follow-up of 8.6 months ± 8.8, primary stent patency was 76%. There was no significant difference in primary stent patency based on anticoagulation status after the procedure (P = .48). There were 2 (4.8%) periprocedural complications.

CONCLUSIONS:

Portomesenteric venoplasty and stent placement following nontransplant HPB surgery is safe with a high rate of technical success if performed before chronic occlusion.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Portal Vein / Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Thrombectomy / Venous Thrombosis / Endovascular Procedures / Mesenteric Ischemia / Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion / Mesenteric Veins Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Portal Vein / Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Thrombectomy / Venous Thrombosis / Endovascular Procedures / Mesenteric Ischemia / Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion / Mesenteric Veins Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article