Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
First-Line Treatment With Atezolizumab Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Weng, Xiuhua; Huang, Xiaoting; Li, Hongchao; Lin, Shen; Rao, Xin; Guo, Xianzhong; Huang, Pinfang.
Affiliation
  • Weng X; Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province.
  • Huang X; Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province.
  • Li H; School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.
  • Lin S; Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province.
  • Rao X; Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province.
  • Guo X; Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province.
  • Huang P; Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 43(5): 340-348, 2020 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32028340
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The authors conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis incorporating recent phase III clinical trial (IMpassion130) data to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel (AnP) against nab-paclitaxel alone as the first-line treatment for advanced triple-negative breast cancer in developed and developing countries. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A decision-analytic Markov model was developed using IMpassion130 data to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of AnP over a lifetime from the US health care payer and Chinese health care system perspective. Model inputs were derived from IMpassion130 and published literature. The primary outcomes of the model were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Uncertainty was addressed using univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS:

For the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the projected mean outcome was better with AnP (1.41 QALYs) than with nab-paclitaxel alone (0.99 QALYs). Similar results were obtained for the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive population, with the obtained mean outcomes of 1.66 and 0.88 QALYs, respectively. For the Unites States, the ICER values comparing AnP with nab-paclitaxel were US$331,996.89 and US$229,359.88 per QALY gained for the ITT and PD-L1-positive populations, respectively. For China, the ICER values were US$106,339.26 and US$72,971.88 per QALY gained for the ITT and PD-L1-positive populations, respectively. The univariate sensitivity analysis indicated that the price of atezolizumab was the most influential factor in our study. AnP had 0% cost-effectiveness at the willingness-to-pay thresholds of US$150,000/QALY in the United States and US$29,383/QALY in China.

CONCLUSION:

AnP is not a cost-effective choice as the first-line treatment for advanced triple-negative breast cancer in the United States and China.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte / Asia Language: En Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte / Asia Language: En Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Year: 2020 Document type: Article
...