Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Everolimus-based Immunosuppression on Renal Function in Liver Transplant Recipients.
Nogueras López, Flor; Abellan Alfocea, Patricia; Ortega Suazo, Eva Julissa; López Garrido, Maria Angeles; Becerra Massare, Antonio; Gila Medina, Ana María; Redondo Cerezo, Eduardo; Espinosa Aguilar, M Dolores.
Affiliation
  • Nogueras López F; Hepatology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain. Electronic address: flornogueras@gmail.com.
  • Abellan Alfocea P; Hepatology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
  • Ortega Suazo EJ; Hepatology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
  • López Garrido MA; Hepatology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
  • Becerra Massare A; Liver Transplant Unit, General Surgery Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
  • Gila Medina AM; Hepatology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
  • Redondo Cerezo E; Hepatology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
  • Espinosa Aguilar MD; Hepatology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Transplant Proc ; 52(2): 556-558, 2020 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32035673
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Calcineurin inhibitors have been implicated in acute and chronic kidney disease after liver transplant (LT). Everolimus (EVR) is a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor efficacious in preventing acute cellular rejection while preserving renal function among LT recipients. We evaluated the benefits on renal function of EVR immunosuppression in LT recipients.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective and observational study in 477 LT recipients in Virgen de las Nieves Hospital from 2002 to 2019 on the use of EVR with tacrolimus minimization or withdrawal in LT recipients with renal dysfunction. The study included 100 patients starting EVR (20.96%); in 66 (66%) the indication was renal dysfunction. The change in renal function was assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software (IBM, Munich, Germany).

RESULTS:

Fifty 8 patients received mycophenolate mofetil (87.8%), and tacrolimus therapy was stopped in 27 patients (40.9%). Induction therapy with basiliximab was administered in 41 patients (62.12%). There was significant difference between estimated glomerular filtration rate at the time of starting EVR and the first month at last follow-up (49.42 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs 75.27 mL/min/1.73 m2; P < .001) and at end of follow-up (24 months) (49.42 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs 64.32 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = .001). The rate of incidence of adverse events was 48.48% (32/66). Seven patients died during follow-up (10.6%), but there were no EVR-related deaths. Eleven patients (16.6%) developed biopsy-proven acute rejection.

CONCLUSION:

This study showed that EVR is associated with a beneficial effect on glomerular filtration rate in both the short and long term in LT recipients.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Liver Transplantation / Renal Insufficiency, Chronic / Everolimus / Immunosuppressive Agents Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Transplant Proc Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Liver Transplantation / Renal Insufficiency, Chronic / Everolimus / Immunosuppressive Agents Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Transplant Proc Year: 2020 Document type: Article