Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transperineal minimally invasive APE: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort.
van Oostendorp, S E; Roodbeen, S X; Chen, C C; Caycedo-Marulanda, A; Joshi, H M; Tanis, P J; Cunningham, C; Tuynman, J B; Hompes, R.
Affiliation
  • van Oostendorp SE; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.vanoostendorp@amsterdamcumc.nl.
  • Roodbeen SX; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Chen CC; Department of Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Koo foundation, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Caycedo-Marulanda A; Department of Surgery, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, Canada.
  • Joshi HM; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
  • Tanis PJ; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Cunningham C; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
  • Tuynman JB; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hompes R; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tech Coloproctol ; 24(8): 823-831, 2020 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32556867
BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal excision (APE) for rectal cancer is associated with a relatively high risk of positive margins and postoperative morbidity, particularly related to perineal wound healing problems. It is unknown whether the use of a minimally invasive approach for the perineal part of these procedures can improve postoperative outcomes without oncological compromise. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of minimally invasive transperineal abdominoperineal excision (TpAPE) METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included all patients having TpAPE for primary low rectal cancer. The primary endpoint was the intraoperative complication rate. Secondary endpoints included major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3), histopathology results, and perineal wound healing. RESULTS: A total of 32 TpAPE procedures were performed in five centers. A bilateral extralevator APE (ELAPE) was performed in 17 patients (53%), a unilateral ELAPE in 7 (22%), and an APE in 8 (25%). Intraoperative complications occurred in five cases (16%) and severe postoperative morbidity in three cases (9%). There were no perioperative deaths. A positive margin (R1) was observed in four patients (13%) and specimen perforation occurred in two (6%). The unilateral extralevator TpAPE group had worse specimen quality and a higher proportion of R1 resections than the bilateral ELAPE or standard APE groups. The rate of uncomplicated perineal wound healing was 53% (n = 17) and three patients (9%) required surgical reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: TpAPE seems to be feasible with acceptable perioperative morbidity and a relatively low rate of perineal wound dehiscence, while histopathological outcomes remain suboptimal. Additional evaluation of the viability of this technique is needed in the form of a prospective trial with standardization of the procedure, indication, audit of outcomes and performed by surgeons with vast experience in transanal total mesorectal excision.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms / Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Proctectomy Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Tech Coloproctol Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms / Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Proctectomy Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Tech Coloproctol Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: