Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Current State of Combined Pediatric Anesthesiology-Critical Care Practice: A Survey of Dual-Trained Practitioners in the United States.
Welch, Timothy P; Kilbaugh, Todd J; McCloskey, John J; Juriga, Lindsay L; Abdallah, Arbi Ben; Fehr, James J.
Affiliation
  • Welch TP; From the Departments of Anesthesiology.
  • Kilbaugh TJ; Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
  • McCloskey JJ; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Juriga LL; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Abdallah AB; From the Departments of Anesthesiology.
  • Fehr JJ; From the Departments of Anesthesiology.
Anesth Analg ; 132(1): 194-201, 2021 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32665467
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Combined practice in pediatric anesthesiology (PA) and pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) was historically common but has declined markedly with time. The reasons for this temporal shift are unclear, but existing evidence suggests that length of training is a barrier to contemporary trainees. Among current practitioners, restriction in dual-specialty practice also occurs, for reasons that are unknown at present. We sought to describe the demographics of this population, investigate their perceptions about the field, and consider factors that lead to attrition.

METHODS:

We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study of physicians in the United States with a combined practice in PA and PCCM. The survey was distributed electronically and anonymously to the distribution list of the Pediatric Anesthesia Leadership Council (PALC) of the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia (SPA), directing the recipients to forward the link to their faculty meeting our inclusion criteria. Attending-level respondents (n = 62) completed an anonymous, 40-question multidomain survey.

RESULTS:

Forty-seven men and 15 women, with a median age of 51, completed the survey. Major leadership positions are held by 44%, and 55% are externally funded investigators. A minority (26%) have given up one or both specialties, citing time constraints and politics as the dominant reasons. Duration of training was cited as the major barrier to entry by 77%. Increasing age and faculty rank and lack of a comparably trained institutional colleague were associated with attrition from dual-specialty practice. The majority (88%) reported that they would do it all again.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current cohort of pediatric anesthesiologist-intensivists in the United States is a small but accomplished group of physicians. Efforts to train, recruit, and retain such providers must address systematic barriers to completion of the requisite training and continued practice.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Attitude of Health Personnel / Surveys and Questionnaires / Critical Care / Anesthesiologists / Pediatricians / Anesthesiology Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Anesth Analg Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Attitude of Health Personnel / Surveys and Questionnaires / Critical Care / Anesthesiologists / Pediatricians / Anesthesiology Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Anesth Analg Year: 2021 Document type: Article
...