Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Attitudes Towards Accreditation and Quality Improvement Activities Among Hospital Employees in Iran: A Quantitative Study.
Kakemam, Edris; Rajabi, Mohammad Reza; Raeissi, Pouran; Ehlers, Lars Holger.
Affiliation
  • Kakemam E; Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Rajabi MR; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
  • Raeissi P; Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Ehlers LH; Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Institute of Business and Management, Faculty of Social Sciences, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
J Multidiscip Healthc ; 13: 799-807, 2020.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32884279
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The hospital accreditation system in Iran is relatively young, having been introduced in 2012. Therefore, there is a real need for research on the status and impact of hospital accreditation in Iran. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare attitudes towards accreditation and quality improvement activities among hospital employees, specifically the attitudes towards the impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare and its benefits in Iran. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A cross-sectional survey was carried out at 23 teaching hospitals in three metropolises in Iran, all of which successfully passed national accreditation surveys. Some 1213 hospital managers, administrative staff, nurses, and para-clinical staff participated in the survey. The main outcome measures were quality results, and the activities related to quality improvement include senior managers' commitment and support, strategic quality planning, education and training, rewards and recognition, quality management, use of data, the involvement of professionals in accreditation, and accreditation benefits. The questionnaire was applied using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree". One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare mean values between respondent groups.

RESULTS:

Among nurses and managers, there was low support for accreditation and even less among para-clinical staff who fail to see accreditation having a positive impact on healthcare quality. Also, nurses' attitudes toward the accreditation benefits were more positive compared with the two other groups. Staff stated that the main reasons for low support were a lack of education and training to act upon the accreditation survey results and a lack of management visibility and support for quality improvement.

CONCLUSION:

Improving quality through means of hospital accreditation is a complex process with high demands for management and employees. Questionnaires on employees' attitudes and perceptions of the impact of accreditation and quality improvement-related activities in the hospitals can provide valuable information on the current problems of a hospital accreditation program.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Multidiscip Healthc Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Multidiscip Healthc Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: