Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Verification of the Optimal Interval Before Esophagectomy After Preoperative Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.
Wakita, Akiyuki; Motoyama, Satoru; Sato, Yusuke; Nagaki, Yushi; Fujita, Hiromu; Terata, Kaori; Imai, Kazuhiro; Minamiya, Yoshihiro.
Affiliation
  • Wakita A; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan. wakita@gipc.akita-u.ac.jp.
  • Motoyama S; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
  • Sato Y; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
  • Nagaki Y; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
  • Fujita H; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
  • Terata K; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
  • Imai K; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
  • Minamiya Y; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 28(4): 2101-2110, 2021 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33051740
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The interval between preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery reportedly affects perioperative outcomes and survival; however, the optimal interval in esophageal cancer patients remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE:

Our aim was to determine whether a prolonged interval between preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) and esophagectomy affects the outcomes of esophageal cancer patients.

METHODS:

A total of 131 patients with esophageal cancer received curative surgery following NACRT at Akita University Hospital between 2009 and 2017. We divided these patients into two groups based on the median interval from NACRT to esophagectomy, and compared the rates of pathological complete response (pCR), surgical outcomes, and survival.

RESULTS:

The median interval from NACRT to esophagectomy was 39 days (range 21-95). Of the 131 patients, 70 (53%) received esophagectomy after 39 days or more from completion of NACRT. There were no significant differences in the clinicopathological features, including pCR rates, between the two groups. Prolongation of the interval from NACRT to esophagectomy was significantly associated with an increased rate of anastomotic leakage and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (p = 0.0225 and p = 0.0022, respectively); however, no association with overall survival was detected.

CONCLUSIONS:

A prolonged interval between NACRT and esophagectomy had no impact on pCR rates or survival. However, delaying esophagectomy may increase the likelihood of surgical complications such as anastomotic leakage and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Esophagectomy Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Esophagectomy Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...