Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes and Tolerability of Definitive and Preoperative Chemoradiation in Elderly Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Institutional Review.
Rahimy, Elham; Koong, Amanda; Toesca, Diego; White, Maya N; Panjwani, Neil; Fisher, George; Chang, Daniel; Pollom, Erqi.
Affiliation
  • Rahimy E; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
  • Koong A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
  • Toesca D; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
  • White MN; Department of Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
  • Panjwani N; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
  • Fisher G; Department of Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
  • Chang D; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
  • Pollom E; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 5(6): 1188-1196, 2020.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33305080
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Our purpose was to report outcomes of elderly patients who underwent definitive treatment involving radiation therapy for esophageal cancer at our institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a retrospective review of patients aged ≥75 years with esophageal cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy (≥45 Gy) at our institution from 1997 to 2019. Acute and late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3+ toxicities were recorded. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS:

Of the 89 patients included, median age was 80 and 78% were male. Median adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index and Karnofsky Performance Status were 5 (3-12) and 80 (50-100), respectively. The majority of cancers were adenocarcinoma (58%), distal (67%), and stage III (62%). Fifty-eight percent underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy, and one-third underwent preoperative intent chemoradiotherapy. Median prescribed dose was 50 Gy (45-66 Gy), and intensity modulated radiation therapy was used in 76%. Eighty-five percent completed the radiation therapy course. Among these, 20% had radiation therapy breaks. For those receiving concurrent chemotherapy, 37% had a dose reduction and 39.5% had a break/cycle reduction. Acute grade 3+ toxicity was 22%, with 2% grade 5 toxicity. Twenty-one of the 29 patients (72%) treated with preoperative intent underwent surgery. There were no deaths 90 days postoperatively. For patients who underwent surgery, 1- and 2-year overall survival were 95% and 84%. For those who did not undergo surgery, 1- and 2-year overall survival were 70% and 52%.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is a role for aggressive radiation therapy in well-selected elderly patients with esophageal cancer. However, optimization of supportive care, chemotherapy regimens, radiation therapy dose/fractionation, and surgical indications are needed to reduce toxicity.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Year: 2020 Document type: Article