Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Saliva as a tool for monitoring hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rodrigues, Renata Prata Cunha Bernardes; Vieira, Walbert de Andrade; Siqueira, Walter Luiz; Agostini, Bernardo Antonio; Moffa, Eduardo Buozi; Paranhos, Luiz Renato.
Affiliation
  • Rodrigues RPCB; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia - UFU, School of Dentistry, Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
  • Vieira WA; Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics Division, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
  • Siqueira WL; University of Saskatchewan, College of Dentistry, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
  • Agostini BA; Faculdade Meridional - IMED, Department of Dentistry, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
  • Moffa EB; Centro Universitário das Faculdades Associadas - Unifae, Department of Dentistry, São João da Boa Vista, SP, Brazil.
  • Paranhos LR; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia - UFU, School of Dentistry, Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res ; 35: e016, 2020.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33331408
This study aimed to assess whether the reductions in serum urea and creatinine levels are different from the reductions in salivary urea and creatinine levels that occur after hemodialysis in chronic renal patients. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. Eight databases were searched to identify pretest-posttest studies of chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis, with no language or year restrictions. The JBI Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analyses using random-effect models were conducted to compare salivary and serum correlations and to pooled mean and proportion differences from pre- to posthemodialysis urea and creatinine levels by subgroup analysis. The I2 test was used to assess heterogeneity, and a meta-regression was performed to statistically assess correlations and differences in the pooled effects pre- and postdialysis. The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the certainty of evidence. The search resulted in 1404 records, and only six studies (n = 252 participants) fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. The studies were published between 2013 and 2018. All studies showed a significant reduction in both salivary and serum urea/creatinine levels. All eligible studies presented a low risk of bias. The meta-analysis shows a moderate to high correlation between salivary and blood levels of urea (r: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.56-1.00) and creatinine (r: 0.64; 95%CI: 0.16-1.00), with a very low level of certainty. The reductions in salivary urea and creatinine levels are similar to and correlated with the reductions in blood urea and creatine levels after hemodialysis among chronic kidney disease patients.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Saliva / Renal Dialysis Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Braz Oral Res Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Saliva / Renal Dialysis Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Braz Oral Res Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: