Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prediction Model for Gastric Cancer With DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiency.
Suzuki, Okihide; Yamaguchi, Tatsuro; Fukuchi, Minoru; Mochiki, Erito; Arai, Tomio; Akagi, Kiwamu; Ishida, Hideyuki.
Affiliation
  • Suzuki O; Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan; osuzu@saitamamed.ac.jp.
  • Yamaguchi T; Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Fukuchi M; Department of Clinical Genetics, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Mochiki E; Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
  • Arai T; Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
  • Akagi K; Department of Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ishida H; Division of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Anticancer Res ; 41(2): 975-982, 2021 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33517304
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

AIM:

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency has received increasing attention as a biomarker of anti-PD-1 treatments of solid tumors including gastric cancer (GC). However, efficient screening has not been established. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

A total of 513 patients were tested for the expression of MMR proteins by immunohistochemistry to identify MMR deficient GC. Development of a prediction model was attempted using the common clinicopathological features.

RESULTS:

In total, 11% (57/513) of the patients showed loss of expression of either one or more MMR proteins (MMR protein deficiency; MMR-D). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age (≥70 years), sex (female), tumor location (lower 1/3), depth invasion (low, T1/T2/T3), and absence of distant metastasis were significantly independent predictive factors of MMR-D GCs. The MMR-D GC probability estimated by the prediction model ranged from 0.4% to 62.2%, and the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.82 (95% confidence interval=0.75-0.87).

CONCLUSION:

Our prediction model can sufficiently and efficiently identify MMR-D GCs using clinical features.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stomach Neoplasms / DNA-Binding Proteins / DNA Mismatch Repair / Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2 / MutL Protein Homolog 1 Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Anticancer Res Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stomach Neoplasms / DNA-Binding Proteins / DNA Mismatch Repair / Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2 / MutL Protein Homolog 1 Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Anticancer Res Year: 2021 Document type: Article