Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A prospective multicentre study of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia in Australia.
Gupta, Sunil; Sidhu, Mayenaaz; Banh, Xuan; Bradbear, Joseph; Byth, Karen; Hourigan, Luke F; Raftopoulos, Spiro; Bourke, Michael J.
Affiliation
  • Gupta S; Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
  • Sidhu M; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
  • Banh X; Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
  • Bradbear J; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
  • Byth K; Princess Alexandra Hospital Health Service District, Brisbane, QLD.
  • Hourigan LF; Princess Alexandra Hospital Health Service District, Brisbane, QLD.
  • Raftopoulos S; Western Sydney Local Health District Research and Education Network, Sydney, NSW.
  • Bourke MJ; NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
Med J Aust ; 214(4): 173-178, 2021 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33611796
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To describe the clinical and procedural outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia in Australia. DESIGN,

SETTING:

Prospective observational study in three Australian tertiary referral centres, 5 May 2014 - 27 October 2019 (66 months).

PARTICIPANTS:

Patients who had undergone POEM for achalasia. MAJOR OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Eckardt scores calculated prior to POEM and six months, one year, and two years after POEM. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as an Eckardt score of 3 or less without a second intervention.

RESULTS:

142 patients underwent POEM for achalasia; their mean age was 52 years (SD, 18 years), 83 were men (58%), and the median length of hospital stay two days (IQR, 1-3 days). Their mean Eckardt score before POEM was 8.0 (SD, 2.4) and 1.1 (SD, 1.6) six months after POEM; it did not change significantly between six months and two years after POEM (mean monthly increase, 0.014 points; 95% CI, -0.001 to 0.029). A total of 127 patients (89%) improved clinically after POEM. Intra-procedural capnoperitoneum was the only risk factor associated with treatment failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.08-7.51). Previous treatments - botulinum toxin injection (25 patients, 18%), endoscopic balloon dilatation (69, 49%), and Heller myotomy (14, 10%) - did not affect POEM outcomes. Five patients (4%) experienced major adverse events, including pneumonia, oesophageal leak, empyema and melaena, that were managed during admission and without sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS:

POEM is an effective treatment for achalasia. Significant reductions in Eckardt scores achieved by six months are sustained at two years. POEM can be both a first line definitive therapy and a salvage therapy for patients not helped by other treatments.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Achalasia / Tertiary Care Centers / Pyloromyotomy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Med J Aust Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Achalasia / Tertiary Care Centers / Pyloromyotomy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Med J Aust Year: 2021 Document type: Article
...