Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validity of Body-Composition Methods across Racial and Ethnic Populations.
Blue, Malia N M; Tinsley, Grant M; Ryan, Eric D; Smith-Ryan, Abbie E.
Affiliation
  • Blue MNM; Department of Exercise Science, High Point University, High Point, NC, USA.
  • Tinsley GM; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
  • Ryan ED; Department of Exercise and Sport Science, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Smith-Ryan AE; Department of Exercise and Sport Science, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Adv Nutr ; 12(5): 1854-1862, 2021 10 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33684215
ABSTRACT
Multi-compartment body-composition models that divide the body into its multiple constituents are the criterion method for measuring body fat percentage, fat mass, and fat-free mass. However, 2- and 3-compartment body-composition devices such as air displacement plethysmography (ADP), DXA, and bioelectrical impedance devices [bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)] are more commonly used. Accurate measures depend on several assumptions, including constant hydration, body proportion, fat-free body density, and population characteristics. Investigations evaluating body composition in racial and ethnic minorities have observed differences in the aforementioned components between cohorts. Consequently, for racial/ethnic minority populations, estimates of body composition may not be valid. The purpose of this review was to comprehensively examine the validity of common body-composition devices in multi-ethnic samples (samples including >1 race/ethnicity) and in African-American, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American populations. Based on the literature, DXA produces valid results in multi-ethnic samples and ADP is valid for Hispanic and African American males when utilizing race-specific equations. However, for DXA and ADP, there is a need for validity investigations that include larger, more racially diverse samples, specifically including Hispanic/Latinx, Asian, Native American adults, and African-American females. Technology has advanced significantly since initial validity studies were conducted; therefore, conclusions are based on outdated models and software. For BIA, body-composition measures may be valid in a multi-ethnic sample, but the literature demonstrates disparate results between races/ethnicities. For BIA and ADP, the majority of studies have utilized DXA or hydrostatic weighing as the criterion to determine validity; additional studies utilizing a multi-compartment model criterion are essential to evaluate accuracy. Validity studies evaluating more recent technology in larger, more racially/ethnically diverse samples may improve our ability to select the appropriate method to accurately assess body composition in each racial/ethnic population.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ethnicity / Minority Groups Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Adv Nutr Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ethnicity / Minority Groups Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Adv Nutr Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: