Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sitting Time, Type, and Context Among Long-Term Weight-Loss Maintainers.
Roake, James; Phelan, Suzanne; Alarcon, Noemi; Keadle, Sarah K; Rethorst, Chad D; Foster, Gary D.
Affiliation
  • Roake J; Department of Kinesiology & Public Health & The Center for Health Research, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, USA.
  • Phelan S; Department of Kinesiology & Public Health & The Center for Health Research, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, USA.
  • Alarcon N; Department of Kinesiology & Public Health & The Center for Health Research, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, USA.
  • Keadle SK; Department of Kinesiology & Public Health & The Center for Health Research, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, USA.
  • Rethorst CD; Texas A&M Agrilife Research, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Foster GD; WW International, Inc., New York, New York, USA.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 29(6): 1067-1073, 2021 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34029443
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to investigate sitting time, the home sedentary environment, and physical activity among weight-loss maintainers in WW (formerly Weight Watchers).

METHODS:

Participants were 4,305 weight-loss maintainers who had maintained ≥9.1 kg of weight loss (24.7 kg on average) for 3.3 years and had an average current BMI of 27.6 kg/m2 . A control group of weight-stable individuals with obesity (n = 619) had an average BMI of 38.9 kg/m2 . The Multicontext Sitting Time Questionnaire and Paffenbarger physical activity questionnaire were administered.

RESULTS:

Weight-loss maintainers versus controls spent 3 hours less per day sitting during the week (10.9 vs. 13.9; η p 2 = 0.039; P = 0.0001) and weekends (9.7 vs. 12.6; η p 2 = 0.038). Weight-loss maintainers versus controls spent 1 hour less per day in non-work-related sitting using a computer or video games during the week (1.4 vs. 2.3; η p 2 = 0.03; P = 0.0001) and weekends (1.5 vs. 2.5; η p 2 = 0.03; P = 0.0001). Weight-loss maintainers versus controls had similar numbers of sedentary-promoting devices (15.8 vs. 14.8) and expended significantly more calories per week in physical activity (1,835 vs. 785; η p 2 = 0.036; P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Weight-loss maintainers reported less time sitting than weight-stable individuals with obesity. Future research should test the efficacy of targeting sitting time to help promote long-term weight-loss maintenance.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Social Environment / Weight Loss / Body Weight Maintenance / Sitting Position / Obesity Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Journal subject: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO / FISIOLOGIA / METABOLISMO Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Social Environment / Weight Loss / Body Weight Maintenance / Sitting Position / Obesity Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Journal subject: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO / FISIOLOGIA / METABOLISMO Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...