Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation interventions incorporating outdoor mobility on ambulatory ability and falls-related self-efficacy after hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sheehan, Katie J; Fitzgerald, Laura; Lambe, Kate; Martin, Finbarr C; Lamb, Sallie E; Sackley, Catherine.
Affiliation
  • Sheehan KJ; Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK. katie.sheehan@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Fitzgerald L; Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK.
  • Lambe K; Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK.
  • Martin FC; Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK.
  • Lamb SE; Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Devon, UK.
  • Sackley C; Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK.
Arch Osteoporos ; 16(1): 99, 2021 06 19.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34148132
ABSTRACT
There is limited evidence from 11 randomised controlled trials on the effect of rehabilitation interventions which incorporate outdoor mobility on ambulatory ability and/or self-efficacy after hip fracture. Outdoor mobility should be central (not peripheral) to future intervention studies targeting improvements in ambulatory ability.

PURPOSE:

Determine the extent to which outdoor mobility is incorporated into rehabilitation interventions after hip fracture. Synthesise the evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions on ambulatory ability and falls-related self-efficacy.

METHODS:

Systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL, PEDro and OpenGrey for published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of community-based rehabilitation interventions incorporating outdoor mobility after hip fracture from database inception to January 2021. Exclusion of protocols, pilot/feasibility studies, secondary analyses of RCTs, nonrandomised and non-English language studies. Duplicate screening for eligibility, risk of bias, and data extraction sample. Random effects meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity with inconsistency-value (I2).

RESULTS:

RCTs (n = 11) provided limited detail on target or achieved outdoor mobility intervention components. There was conflicting evidence from 2 RCTs for the effect on outdoor walking ability at 1-3 months (risk difference 0.19; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.21, 0.58; I2 = 92%), no effect on walking endurance at intervention end (standardised mean difference 0.05; 95% CI - 0.26, 0.35; I2 = 36%); and suggestive (CI crosses null) of a small effect on self-efficacy at 1-3 months (standardised mean difference 0.25; 95% CI - 0.29, 0.78; I2 = 87%) compared with routine care/sham intervention.

CONCLUSION:

It was not possible to attribute any benefit observed to an outdoor mobility intervention component due to poor reporting of target or achieved outdoor mobility and/or quality of the underlying evidence. Given the low proportion of patients recovering outdoor mobility after hip fracture, future research on interventions with outdoor mobility as a central component is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration CRD42021236541.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Accidental Falls / Hip Fractures Type of study: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Arch Osteoporos Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Accidental Falls / Hip Fractures Type of study: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Arch Osteoporos Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...