Comparative analysis of modified Bacon operation and double stapler operation in the treatment of rectal cancer.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of modified Bacon operation and double stapler operation in treating lower rectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 73 patients with lower rectal cancer admitted to the general surgery department of our hospital from March 2016 to March 2017 were selected for the study. According to different operation methods, the patients were divided into an observation group and a control group. Modified Bacon operation was used in the observation group (39 cases), while double stapler operation was adopted for the control group (34 cases). The intraoperative and postoperative conditions and 3-year survival rates were observed. RESULTS: The bleeding volume and anal exhaust time in the observation group were better than those in the control group, the difference being statistically significant (P<0.05). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the operation time, abdominal drainage volume, anal extubation time, or the number of lymph node dissection (P>0.05). The anal function of the two groups was evaluated one month and six months after operation respectively, and no significant difference was found between the function of the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications, local recurrence, and distant metastasis between the two groups (P>0.05). The 3-year survival rate was 89.74% in the observation group and 91.18% in the control group. Our analysis found no significant difference in the cumulative survival rates between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Modified Bacon operation and double stapler operation are effective treatment for lower rectal cancer, and the survival benefit of patients is obvious. The methods are worthy of clinical promotion.