Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biatrial volume ratio predicts low voltage areas in atrial fibrillation.
Seewöster, Timm; Dinov, Borislav; Nedios, Sotirios; Hindricks, Gerhard; Sommer, Philipp; Kornej, Jelena.
Affiliation
  • Seewöster T; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital of Cardiology, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Dinov B; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital of Cardiology, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Nedios S; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital of Cardiology, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Hindricks G; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital of Cardiology, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Sommer P; Department of Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
  • Kornej J; School of Medicine - Cardiovascular Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Clin Cardiol ; 44(11): 1560-1566, 2021 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34494677
BACKGROUND: Left atrial volume (LAV) and low voltage areas (LVAs) are acknowledged markers for worse rhythm outcome after ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Some studies reported the importance of increased right atrial volume (RAV) as a predictor for arrhythmia recurrences in AF patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate association between the LAV/RAV ratio and LVAs presence. METHODS: Patients undergoing first AF ablation were included. LVAs were assessed peri-procedurally using high-density 3D maps and defined as <0.5 mV. All patients underwent pre-procedural cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. LAV (biplane) and RAV (monoplane 4-chamber) were assessed prior to ablation, and the LAV/RAV ratio was calculated. RESULTS: The study population included 189 patients (age mean 63 ± 10 years, 33% women, 57% persistent AF, 22% LVAs). There were 149 (79%) patients with LAV > RAV. In univariable analysis LAV > RAV was associated with LVAs (OR 6.803, 95%CI 1.395-26.514, p = .016). The association remained robust in multivariable model after adjustment for persistent AF, CHA2 DS2 -VASc score, and heart rate (OR 5.981, 95%CI 1.256-28.484, p = .025). Using receiver operator curve analysis, LAV > RAV (AUC 0.668, 95%CI 0.585-0.751, p = .001) was significant predictor for LVAs. In multivariable analysis, after adjustment for age, persistent AF, and renal function, RAV≥LAV was threefold higher in males (OR 3.040, 95%CI 1.050-8.802, p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: LAV > RAV is useful for the prediction of electro-anatomical substrate in AF. LAV > RAV was associated with LVAs presence, while male sex remained associated with RAV≥LAV and less LVAs.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Atrial Fibrillation / Catheter Ablation Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Cardiol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Atrial Fibrillation / Catheter Ablation Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Cardiol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: