Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A framework for chemical safety assessment incorporating new approach methodologies within REACH.
Ball, Nicholas; Bars, Remi; Botham, Philip A; Cuciureanu, Andreea; Cronin, Mark T D; Doe, John E; Dudzina, Tatsiana; Gant, Timothy W; Leist, Marcel; van Ravenzwaay, Bennard.
Affiliation
  • Ball N; Dow Europe, Toxicology and Environmental Research and Consulting, Bachtobelstrasse 3, 8810, Horgen, Switzerland.
  • Bars R; Bayer CropScience, 355 rue Dostoïevski, 06903, Sophia Antipolis, France.
  • Botham PA; Syngenta Product Safety, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, RG42 6EY, Berkshire, UK.
  • Cuciureanu A; ECETOC AISBL, Rue Belliard 40, 1040, Bruxelles, Belgium.
  • Cronin MTD; School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.
  • Doe JE; School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK. j.e.doe@ljmu.ac.uk.
  • Dudzina T; ExxonMobilBiomedical Sciences Inc, Hermeslaan 2, 1831, Machelen, Belgium.
  • Gant TW; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Exposures and Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Leist M; CAAT-Europe and Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78464, Konstanz, Germany.
  • van Ravenzwaay B; BASF SE, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Arch Toxicol ; 96(3): 743-766, 2022 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35103819
The long-term investment in new approach methodologies (NAMs) within the EU and other parts of the world is beginning to result in an emerging consensus of how to use information from in silico, in vitro and targeted in vivo sources to assess the safety of chemicals. However, this methodology is being adopted very slowly for regulatory purposes. Here, we have developed a framework incorporating in silico, in vitro and in vivo methods designed to meet the requirements of REACH in which both hazard and exposure can be assessed using a tiered approach. The outputs from each tier are classification categories, safe doses, and risk assessments, and progress through the tiers depends on the output from previous tiers. We have exemplified the use of the framework with three examples. The outputs were the same or more conservative than parallel assessments based on conventional studies. The framework allows a transparent and phased introduction of NAMs in chemical safety assessment and enables science-based safety decisions which provide the same level of public health protection using fewer animals, taking less time, and using less financial and expert resource. Furthermore, it would also allow new methods to be incorporated as they develop through continuous selective evolution rather than periodic revolution.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Toxicity Tests / Risk Assessment / Chemical Safety Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: Arch Toxicol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Toxicity Tests / Risk Assessment / Chemical Safety Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: Arch Toxicol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: