Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Information for Ureteric Stent Placement: A Quality Assessment Study.
Chaudhary, Kapil; Chandna, Abhishek; Kumar Devana, Sudheer; Sharma, Aditya Prakash; Tyagi, Shantanu; Singh, Shrawan K.
Affiliation
  • Chaudhary K; Department of Urology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
  • Chandna A; Department of Urology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
  • Kumar Devana S; Department of Urology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
  • Sharma AP; Department of Urology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
  • Tyagi S; Department of Urology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
  • Singh SK; Department of Urology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Front Surg ; 8: 816222, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35178426
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the quality of YouTube videos on ureteric stent placement (USP) as a source of patient available.

METHODS:

YouTube was searched using search terms "DJ stenting," "Double J stenting," and "ureteric stenting." The initial 100 videos displayed with each of the above mentioned search terms were scrutinized. The selected videos reviewed by 3 independent consultant urologists against a pre-agreed scoring system based upon European Association of Urology (EAU) patient information sheet on ureteric stent placement. The videos were scored qualitatively and quantitatively based on the scores achieved in various domains of the scoring Performa. Data was also collected for the number of views, likes, dislikes, and time duration of each video.

RESULTS:

A total of 22 videos which fulfilled the inclusion criteria were reviewed. All the videos were uploaded by healthcare organizations or healthcare websites. None of the videos were classified as "Good" based on reviewer scores and only one video was classified as "acceptable." Fourteen videos were classified as "very poor" with a score of <5/20. General information about stents was described by majority of the studies whilst preoperative information, procedure description, danger signs, and follow up were scarcely described by most videos.

CONCLUSION:

Majority of YouTube videos on USP are of poor overall quality and lack pertinent information. This calls for creation of comprehensive and unbiased videos for patient information on USP.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Front Surg Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Front Surg Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: