Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Enhancing cancer prevention and survivorship care with a videoconferencing model for continuing education: a mixed-methods study to identify barriers and incentives to participation.
Milgrom, Zheng Z; Severance, Tyler S; Scanlon, Caitlin M; Carson, Anyé T; Janota, Andrea D; Burns, John L; Vik, Terry A; Duwve, Joan M; Dixon, Brian E; Mendonca, Eneida A.
Affiliation
  • Milgrom ZZ; Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Severance TS; Department of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Scanlon CM; Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Carson AT; Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Janota AD; Division Palliative Care, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Burns JL; Dean's Office, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Vik TA; Dean's Office, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Duwve JM; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Dixon BE; Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Mendonca EA; Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
JAMIA Open ; 5(1): ooac004, 2022 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35178505
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To enhance cancer prevention and survivorship care by local health care providers, a school of public health introduced an innovative telelearning continuing education program using the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) model. In ECHO's hub and spoke structure, synchronous videoconferencing connects frontline health professionals at various locations ("spokes") with experts at the facilitation center ("hub"). Sessions include experts' didactic presentations and case discussions led by spoke site participants. The objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of the reasons individuals choose or decline to participate in the Cancer ECHO program and to identify incentives and barriers to doing so. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Study participants were recruited from the hub team, spoke site participants, and providers who attended another ECHO program but not this one. Participants chose to take a survey or be interviewed. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided qualitative data coding and analysis.

RESULTS:

We conducted 22 semistructured interviews and collected 30 surveys. Incentives identified included the program's high-quality design, supportive learning climate, and access to information. Barriers included a lack of external incentives to participate and limited time available. Participants wanted more adaptability in program timing to fit providers' busy schedules.

CONCLUSION:

Although the merits of the Cancer ECHO program were widely acknowledged, adaptations to facilitate participation and emphasize the program's benefits may help overcome barriers to attending. As the number of telelearning programs grows, the results of this study point to ways to expand participation and spread health benefits more widely.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: JAMIA Open Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: JAMIA Open Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: