Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laparoscopic Reintervention for Intraperitoneal Leaks After Colonic Surgery: Do We Need a Routine Stoma?
Chen, Yi-Chang; Fingerhut, Abe; Tsai, Yuan-Yao; Chang, Sheng-Chi; Ke, Tao-Wei; Shen, Ming-Yin; Tzu-Liang Chen, William.
Affiliation
  • Chen YC; Attending Surgeon, Department of Colorectal Surgery, RinggoldID:%2038020China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Fingerhut A; Associate professor Surgical Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, and Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Poissy, France.
  • Tsai YY; Attending Surgeon, Department of Colorectal Surgery, RinggoldID:%2038020China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Chang SC; Attending Surgeon, Department of Colorectal Surgery, RinggoldID:%2038020China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Ke TW; Attending Surgeon, Department of Colorectal Surgery, RinggoldID:%2038020China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Shen MY; Director, Department of Colorectal Surgery, RinggoldID:%2038020China Medical University Hospital, Taiwan, China.
  • Tzu-Liang Chen W; Superintendent, RinggoldID:%2038020China Medical University Hospital, Zhubei, Taiwan.
Surg Innov ; 29(6): 697-704, 2022 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35227152
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

No universal consensus exists on the management of intraperitoneal anastomosis leakage after colonic surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic reintervention without stoma creation for intraperitoneal leaks after colonic surgery. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Single tertiary center study conducted from January 2010 to December 2020. 54 patients with intraperitoneal leakage were divided into 2 groups according to whether they received a stoma (n = 37) or not (n = 17) during laparoscopic reintervention. Short term outcome was analyzed.

RESULTS:

Patients in the no stoma group had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (P = .009), lower Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score (5 vs. 10; P < .001) compared with the stoma group. Intensive care unit admission (43.2% vs. 5.8%; P = .006) and major complications (35.1% vs. 5.8%; P = .015) occurred more in the stoma group compared to the no stoma group. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, initial surgical procedure (P = .001) and APACHE II score (P = .039) were significant predictors of no stoma. The APACHE II score(P = .035) was an independent predictor of major complications. Finally, Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of APACHE II score for no stoma was 7.5.

CONCLUSIONS:

In our study, APACHE II score was an independent predictor of stoma formation and the cutoff value of APACHE II score for no stoma was 7.5. Our results need to be confirmed by larger and randomized studies. In particular, a specific APACHE II threshold to omit a stoma in this setting remains to be determined.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Laparoscopy / Surgical Stomas Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Surg Innov Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Laparoscopy / Surgical Stomas Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Surg Innov Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: