Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sources of variation in elemental profiles of whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) and their potential effects on the accuracy of discriminant analysis.
Davis, Robert; Boyd, Claude; Gonzalez, Arturo; Shatova, Olga; Wakefield, Joshua; Harris, Blake; McNevin, Aaron; Davis, D Allen.
Affiliation
  • Davis R; Auburn University, School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn, AL, USA. Electronic address: Robert.davis.bd@gmail.com.
  • Boyd C; Auburn University, School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn, AL, USA.
  • Gonzalez A; World Wildlife Fund, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
  • Shatova O; Oritain Global Limited, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Wakefield J; Oritain Global Limited, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Harris B; World Wildlife Fund, Washington DC, USA.
  • McNevin A; World Wildlife Fund, Washington DC, USA.
  • Davis DA; Auburn University, School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn, AL, USA.
J Trace Elem Med Biol ; 71: 126961, 2022 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35231879
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Elemental profiling is a tool that has been proposed to improve the traceability of seafood products. Small sources of variation can affect the outcome of elemental profiling and therefore pose to lower the overall accuracy of analyses. Here, we investigate two potential sources of variation through three experiments laboratory variation (intra-, interlaboratory variation, and tissue matrix) and tissue variation. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

Samples of whitleleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) were obtained from 20 farms in Ecuador and two farms in Alabama to be analyzed. In the first experiment of the study, samples from Ecuador were analyzed at three different laboratories and compared. Two out of the five elements reported were statistically different across the three laboratories (Cu and Se). In the second experiment, the effect of tissue matrix (ground vs whole tissue during acid digestion) was investigated. Altogether, five out of 29 elements analyzed were statistically different. In the third experiment, samples from two farms in Alabama were analyzed to understand the variation in element concentrations in different tissues (head on shell on (HOSO), headless shell on (HLSO), headless peeled (PLD) and headless peeled and deveined (PLDV)). Elemental concentrations varied across tissues, and patterns in elemental concentrations were site specific. The samples from the two farms were analyzed with a Random Forest classification model to site x tissue groupings with 94% accuracy.

CONCLUSION:

The result of this study highlights the following 1. Consistency in laboratory analysis important in studies that involve element concentrations, as minor differences in methodology can propagate as significant differences in results. 2. In shrimp, elements are compartmentalized in different tissues and elemental profiling should consistently use the same type of tissue.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aquaculture / Penaeidae Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: J Trace Elem Med Biol Journal subject: METABOLISMO / SAUDE AMBIENTAL Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aquaculture / Penaeidae Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: J Trace Elem Med Biol Journal subject: METABOLISMO / SAUDE AMBIENTAL Year: 2022 Document type: Article