Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analyzing longitudinal binary data in clinical studies.
Li, Yihan; Feng, Dai; Sui, Yunxia; Li, Hong; Song, Yanna; Zhan, Tianyu; Cicconetti, Greg; Jin, Man; Wang, Hongwei; Chan, Ivan; Wang, Xin.
Affiliation
  • Li Y; Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA. Electronic address: yihan.li@abbvie.com.
  • Feng D; Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
  • Sui Y; Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
  • Li H; Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
  • Song Y; Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
  • Zhan T; Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
  • Cicconetti G; Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
  • Jin M; Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
  • Wang H; Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
  • Chan I; Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA; Global Biometrics and Data Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, 300 Connell Drive, Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922, USA.
  • Wang X; Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA; Global Biometrics and Data Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, 300 Connell Drive, Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922, USA.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 115: 106717, 2022 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35240309
ABSTRACT
In clinical studies, it is common to have binary outcomes collected over time as repeated measures. This manuscript reviews and evaluates two popular classes of statistical methods for analyzing binary response data with repeated

measures:

likelihood-based Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM), and semiparametric Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE). Recommendations for choice of analysis model and points to consider for implementation in clinical studies in the presence of missing data are provided based on a comprehensive literature review, as well as, a simulation study evaluating the performance of both GLMM and GEE under scenarios representative of typical clinical trial settings. Under Missing at Random (MAR) assumption, GLMM is preferred over GEE, and the SAS PROC GLIMMIX marginal model is recommended for implementing GLMM in analyzing clinical trial data. When there is an underlying continuous variable used to define the binary response, and the missing proportion is high and/or unbalanced between treatment groups, a two-step approach combining Multiple Imputation (MI) and GEE (MI-GEE) is recommended.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Research Design / Models, Statistical Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Journal subject: MEDICINA / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Research Design / Models, Statistical Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Journal subject: MEDICINA / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2022 Document type: Article