Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deep learning-based velocity antialiasing of 4D-flow MRI.
Berhane, Haben; Scott, Michael B; Barker, Alex J; McCarthy, Patrick; Avery, Ryan; Allen, Brad; Malaisrie, Chris; Robinson, Joshua D; Rigsby, Cynthia K; Markl, Michael.
Affiliation
  • Berhane H; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
  • Scott MB; Department of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Barker AJ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
  • McCarthy P; Department of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Avery R; Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Allen B; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Malaisrie C; Department of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Robinson JD; Department of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Rigsby CK; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Markl M; Department of Medical Imaging, Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Magn Reson Med ; 88(1): 449-463, 2022 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35381116
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the robust and fast correction of velocity aliasing in 4D-flow MRI.

METHODS:

This study included 667 adult subjects with aortic 4D-flow MRI data with existing velocity aliasing (n = 362) and no velocity aliasing (n = 305). Additionally, 10 controls received back-to-back 4D-flow scans with systemically varied velocity-encoding sensitivity (vencs) at 60, 100, and 175 cm/s. The no-aliasing data sets were used to simulate velocity aliasing by reducing the venc to 40%-70% of the original, alongside a ground truth locating all aliased voxels (153 training, 152 testing). The 152 simulated and 362 existing aliasing data sets were used for testing and compared with a conventional velocity antialiasing algorithm. Dice scores were calculated to quantify CNN performance. For controls, the venc 175-cm/s scans were used as the ground truth and compared with the CNN-corrected venc 60 and 100 cm/s data sets

RESULTS:

The CNN required 176 ± 30 s to perform compared with 162 ± 14 s for the conventional algorithm. The CNN showed excellent performance for the simulated data compared with the conventional algorithm (median range of Dice scores CNN [0.89-0.99], conventional algorithm [0.84-0.94], p < 0.001, across all simulated vencs) and detected more aliased voxels in existing velocity aliasing data sets (median detected CNN 159 voxels [31-605], conventional algorithm 65 [7-417], p < 0.001). For controls, the CNN showed Dice scores of 0.98 [0.95-0.99] and 0.96 [0.87-0.99] for venc = 60 cm/s and 100 cm/s, respectively, while flow comparisons showed moderate-excellent agreement.

CONCLUSION:

Deep learning enabled fast and robust velocity anti-aliasing in 4D-flow MRI.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Deep Learning Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Magn Reson Med Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Deep Learning Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Magn Reson Med Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: