Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estimating the impact of cefuroxime versus cefazolin and amoxicillin/clavulanate use on future collateral resistance: a retrospective comparison.
Chowers, Michal; Zehavi, Tamir; Gottesman, Bat Sheva; Baraz, Avi; Nevo, Daniel; Obolski, Uri.
Affiliation
  • Chowers M; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
  • Zehavi T; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
  • Gottesman BS; Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Baraz A; Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
  • Nevo D; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
  • Obolski U; Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 77(7): 1992-1995, 2022 06 29.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35425954
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Quantitative estimates of collateral resistance induced by antibiotic use are scarce.

OBJECTIVES:

To estimate the effects of treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanate or cefazolin, compared with cefuroxime, on future resistance to ceftazidime among hospitalized patients.

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of patients with positive bacterial cultures hospitalized in an Israeli hospital during 2016-19 was conducted. Patients were restricted to those treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefazolin or cefuroxime and re-hospitalized with a positive bacterial culture during the following year. Matching was performed using exact, Mahalanobis and propensity score matching. Each patient in the amoxicillin/clavulanate and cefazolin groups was matched to a single patient from the cefuroxime group, yielding 185185 and 298298 matched patients. Logistic regression and the g-formula (standardization) were used to estimate the OR, risk difference (RD) and number needed to harm (NNH).

RESULTS:

Cefuroxime induced significantly higher resistance to ceftazidime than amoxicillin/clavulanate or cefazolin; the marginal OR was 1.76 (95% CI = 1.16-2.83) compared with amoxicillin/clavulanate and 1.98 (95% CI = 1.41-2.8) compared with cefazolin and the RD was 0.118 (95% CI = 0.031-0.215) compared with amoxicillin/clavulanate and 0.131 (95% CI = 0.058-0.197) compared with cefazolin. We also estimated the NNH; replacing amoxicillin/clavulanate or cefazolin with cefuroxime would yield ceftazidime resistance in 1 more patient for every 8.5 (95% CI = 4.66-32.14) or 7.6 (95% CI = 5.1-17.3) patients re-hospitalized in the following year, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results indicate that treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanate or cefazolin is preferable to cefuroxime, in terms of future collateral resistance. The results presented here are a first step towards quantitative estimations of the ecological damage caused by different antibiotics.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cefazolin / Cefuroxime Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cefazolin / Cefuroxime Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...