Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure and postoperative pulmonary complications: a patient-level meta-analysis of three randomised clinical trials.
Campos, Niklas S; Bluth, Thomas; Hemmes, Sabrine N T; Librero, Julian; Pozo, Natividad; Ferrando, Carlos; Ball, Lorenzo; Mazzinari, Guido; Pelosi, Paolo; Gama de Abreu, Marcelo; Schultz, Marcus J; Serpa Neto, A.
Affiliation
  • Campos NS; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Cardio-Pulmonary Department, Pulmonary Division, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Bluth T; Pulmonary Engineering Group, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Hemmes SNT; Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Librero J; Navarrabiomed-Fundación Miguel Servet, Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Pamplona, Spain.
  • Pozo N; INCLIVA Clinical Research Institute, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
  • Ferrando C; Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
  • Ball L; Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
  • Mazzinari G; Research Group in Perioperative Medicine, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain; Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain.
  • Pelosi P; Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
  • Gama de Abreu M; Pulmonary Engineering Group, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Schultz MJ; Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (LEICA), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Nuffield Department of Medicine, Uni
  • Serpa Neto A; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Cardio-Pulmonary Department, Pulmonary Division, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Department of Intensive Care, Amster
Br J Anaesth ; 128(6): 1040-1051, 2022 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35431038
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

High intraoperative PEEP with recruitment manoeuvres may improve perioperative outcomes. We re-examined this question by conducting a patient-level meta-analysis of three clinical trials in adult patients at increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications who underwent non-cardiothoracic and non-neurological surgery.

METHODS:

The three trials enrolled patients at 128 hospitals in 24 countries from February 2011 to February 2018. All patients received volume-controlled ventilation with low tidal volume. Analyses were performed using one-stage, two-level, mixed modelling (site as a random effect; trial as a fixed effect). The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications within the first week, analysed using mixed-effect logistic regression. Pre-specified subgroup analyses of nine patient characteristics and seven procedure and care-delivery characteristics were also performed.

RESULTS:

Complete datasets were available for 1913 participants ventilated with high PEEP and recruitment manoeuvres, compared with 1924 participants who received low PEEP. The primary outcome occurred in 562/1913 (29.4%) participants randomised to high PEEP, compared with 620/1924 (32.2%) participants randomised to low PEEP (unadjusted odds ratio [OR]=0.87; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.75-1.01; P=0.06). Higher PEEP resulted in 87/1913 (4.5%) participants requiring interventions for desaturation, compared with 216/1924 (11.2%) participants randomised to low PEEP (OR=0.34; 95% CI, 0.26-0.45). Intraoperative hypotension was associated more frequently (784/1913 [41.0%]) with high PEEP, compared with low PEEP (579/1924 [30.1%]; OR=1.87; 95% CI, 1.60-2.17).

CONCLUSIONS:

High PEEP combined with recruitment manoeuvres during low tidal volume ventilation in patients undergoing major surgery did not reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03937375 (Clinicaltrials.gov).
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Positive-Pressure Respiration / Lung Diseases Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Br J Anaesth Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Positive-Pressure Respiration / Lung Diseases Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Br J Anaesth Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...