Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differential Neutralization of Unfractionated Heparin and Enoxaparin by Andexanet Alfa.
Lewis, Joseph; Iqbal, Omer; Jeske, Walter; Hoppensteadt, Debra; Siddiqui, Fakiha; Fareed, Jawed.
Affiliation
  • Lewis J; Cardiovascular Research Institute, 550858Loyola University Chicago, Health Sciences Divisions, Maywood, IL, USA.
  • Iqbal O; Cardiovascular Research Institute, 550858Loyola University Chicago, Health Sciences Divisions, Maywood, IL, USA.
  • Jeske W; Cardiovascular Research Institute, 550858Loyola University Chicago, Health Sciences Divisions, Maywood, IL, USA.
  • Hoppensteadt D; Cardiovascular Research Institute, 550858Loyola University Chicago, Health Sciences Divisions, Maywood, IL, USA.
  • Siddiqui F; Cardiovascular Research Institute, 550858Loyola University Chicago, Health Sciences Divisions, Maywood, IL, USA.
  • Fareed J; Program in Health Science, Universidad Católica de Murcia, Spain.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ; 28: 10760296221099934, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35535398
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is an approved antidote used to reverse the bleeding effects of Direct Oral Anticoagulant (Direct-Xa agents) agents because it reverses anti-Xa activity. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) exhibit anti-Xa activity. The purpose is to investigate the neutralization of UFH and LMWH by andexanet in activated clotting time (ACT), thrombelastography (TEG), and anti-Xa due to the protamine sulfate shortage.

METHODS:

UFH and LMWH were studied with andexanet, PS, or saline as potential reversal agents/controls at varying concentrations in ACT, TEG, and anti-Xa and compared to each other.

RESULTS:

Andexanet partially neutralized both drugs several TEG parameters at high andexanet concentrations, but it was not as effective as protamine sulfate in any of the assays used. Most TEG parameters were correlated with andexanet concentration. In ACT, significant neutralization was demonstrated at many andexanet concentrations for UFH, but not LMWH. UFH was completely neutralized by PS in ACT, while LMWH was partially neutralized by PS in ACT. Andexanet alfa was a less effective neutralization agent than the protamine sulfate as it only partially neutralized UFH in ACT and was ineffective at neutralizing LMWH when tested at the same concentration as PS (10 ug/mL).

CONCLUSION:

Andexanet partially neutralized UFH and LMWH with variability between assays, necessitating investigation into assay-dependent differences.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Heparin / Enoxaparin Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Appl Thromb Hemost Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Heparin / Enoxaparin Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Appl Thromb Hemost Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...