Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of behavioural activation to manage pain: a systematic scoping review.
Walsh, Sandra; Moseley, G Lorimer; Gray, Richard John; Gillam, Marianne; Gunn, Kate M; Barker, Trevor; Tran, Kham; Eshetie, Tesfahun; Jones, Martin.
Affiliation
  • Walsh S; Department of Rural Health, University of South Australian - Whyalla Campus, Whyalla Norrie, Barngarla Country, South Australia, Australia.
  • Moseley GL; IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Gray RJ; IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Gillam M; School of Nursing, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
  • Gunn KM; Department of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Mt Barker, South Australia, Australia.
  • Barker T; IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Tran K; Department of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Mt Barker, South Australia, Australia.
  • Eshetie T; IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Jones M; Department of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
BMJ Open ; 12(6): e056404, 2022 06 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35649614
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Behavioural activation (BA) is an effective treatment for depression; however, it is unclear if it can be used to manage pain.

OBJECTIVES:

To conduct a scoping review of primary research that reported using BA to support people living with chronic pain to understand how BA had been used in relation to pain. In addition, we wanted to understand whether there were any reported changes in that pain, and how and who delivered BA. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Primary research published in English. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE We searched seven databases MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Emcare, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science, for primary research. No initial date limit was used with the date the searches were conducted used as the end date limit (1 July 2021). CHARTING

METHODS:

A customised data extraction table was developed, piloted and used.

RESULTS:

551 papers were screened for inclusion, with 15 papers included in our review. Studies were conducted in North America and in Canada. These included three case studies, nine uncontrolled trials and three randomised controlled trials. Only two studies reported pain as the primary outcome. BA was applied across a range of pain related conditions. The dose of BA ranged from 3 to 16 sessions. Duration of treatment was 3 weeks to 12 months. Most studies reported reductions in pain following exposure to BA.

CONCLUSION:

BA has the potential to reduce pain. Caution needs to be exercised in the interpretation of these findings as a high risk of bias was observed in most studies. High-quality research is required to test if BA is an effective intervention for chronic pain.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Chronic Pain Type of study: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Chronic Pain Type of study: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...