Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Thromboprophylaxis with Heparins Following Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
Chi, Gerald; Lee, Jane J; Sheng, Shi; Marszalek, Jolanta; Chuang, Michael L.
Affiliation
  • Chi G; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Lee JJ; Department of Trial Design and Development, Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Sheng S; Department of Vascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
  • Marszalek J; Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
  • Chuang ML; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Thromb Haemost ; 122(7): 1159-1168, 2022 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35717948
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The efficacy and safety of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains unclear.

METHODS:

A literature search was performed to collect studies comparing the effect of thromboprophylaxis in patients with ICH. The primary endpoints were deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and hematoma expansion or rebleeding. A meta-analytic approach was employed to estimate the relative risk (RR) by fitting fixed-effects (FE) and random-effects (RE) models.

RESULTS:

A total of 28 studies representing 3,697 hospitalized patients with ICH were included. Thromboprophylaxis was initiated within 4 days following hospital presentation and continued for 10 to 14 days in most of studies. Compared with control, thromboprophylaxis was associated with a reduced risk of DVT (47/1,399 [3.4%] vs. 202/1,377 [14.7%]; FE RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.18-0.32; RE RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.19-0.39) as well as PE (9/953 [0.9%] vs. 37/864 [4.3%]; FE RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19-0.57; RE RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21-0.66). Thromboprophylaxis was not associated with increased risk of hematoma expansion or rebleeding (32/1,319 [2.4%] vs. 37/1,301 [2.8%]; FE RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.48-1.18; RE RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.49-1.30) or mortality (117/925 [12.6%] vs. 139/904 [15.4%]; FE RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65-1.03; RE RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.66-1.04).

CONCLUSION:

Thromboprophylaxis was effective in preventing DVT and PE without increasing the risk of hematoma expansion or bleeding among ICH patients. Future studies should explore the long-term effects of thromboprophylaxis in this population, particularly on the functional outcomes.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pulmonary Embolism / Venous Thrombosis / Venous Thromboembolism Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Thromb Haemost Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pulmonary Embolism / Venous Thrombosis / Venous Thromboembolism Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Thromb Haemost Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: