Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of Serological Methods for COVID-19 and Retrospective Screening of Health Employees and Visitors to the São Paulo University Hospital, Brazil.
Andreata-Santos, Robert; Machado, Rafael Rahal Guaragna; Alves, Rúbens Prince Dos Santos; Sales, Natiely Silva; Soares, Camila Pereira; Rodrigues, Karine Bitencourt; Silva, Mariângela Oliveira; Favaro, Marianna Teixeira de Pinho; Rodrigues-Jesus, Mônica Josiane; Yamamoto, Márcio Massao; de Andrade, Juliana Bannwart; Fock, Ricardo Ambrósio; Margarido, Paulo Francisco Ramos; Carvalho, Cristiane Rodrigues Guzzo; Boscardin, Silvia Beatriz; Durigon, Edison Luiz; Ferreira, Luís C S.
Affiliation
  • Andreata-Santos R; Vaccine Development Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Machado RRG; Retrovirology Laboratory, Immunology and Microbiology Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Alves RPDS; Clinical and Molecular Virology Laboratory, Microbiology Department, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Sales NS; Vaccine Development Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Soares CP; Vaccine Development Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Rodrigues KB; Clinical and Molecular Virology Laboratory, Microbiology Department, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Silva MO; Vaccine Development Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Favaro MTP; Vaccine Development Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Rodrigues-Jesus MJ; Vaccine Development Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Yamamoto MM; Vaccine Development Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Andrade JB; Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Fock RA; School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Margarido PFR; Clinical Laboratory Division, Pharmacy and Clinical Laboratory Department, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Carvalho CRG; School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Boscardin SB; Clinical Laboratory Division, Pharmacy and Clinical Laboratory Department, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Durigon EL; School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Ferreira LCS; Molecular and Structural Biology, Secretion Systems and c-di-GMP Signalling Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 12: 787411, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35719329
ABSTRACT
Reliable serological tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among infected or vaccinated individuals are important for epidemiological and clinical studies. Low-cost approaches easily adaptable to high throughput screenings, such as Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA) or electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), can be readily validated using different SARS-CoV-2 antigens. A total of 1,119 serum samples collected between March and July of 2020 from health employees and visitors to the University Hospital at the University of São Paulo were screened with the Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay (Elecsys) (Roche Diagnostics) and three in-house ELISAs that are based on different antigens the Nucleoprotein (N-ELISA), the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD-ELISA), and a portion of the S1 protein (ΔS1-ELISA). Virus neutralization test (CPE-VNT) was used as the gold standard to validate the serological assays. We observed high sensitivity and specificity values with the Elecsys (96.92% and 98.78%, respectively) and N-ELISA (93.94% and 94.40%, respectively), compared with RBD-ELISA (90.91% sensitivity and 88.80% specificity) and the ΔS1-ELISA (77.27% sensitivity and 76% specificity). The Elecsys® proved to be a reliable SARS-CoV-2 serological test. Similarly, the recombinant SARS-CoV-2 N protein displayed good performance in the ELISA tests. The availability of reliable diagnostic tests is critical for the precise determination of infection rates, particularly in countries with high SARS-CoV-2 infection rates, such as Brazil. Collectively, our results indicate that the development and validation of new serological tests based on recombinant proteins may provide new alternatives for the SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic market.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: