Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Computed-Tomography Estimates of Interaural Mismatch in Insertion Depth and Scalar Location in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.
Goupell, Matthew J; Noble, Jack H; Phatak, Sandeep A; Kolberg, Elizabeth; Cleary, Miranda; Stakhovskaya, Olga A; Jensen, Kenneth K; Hoa, Michael; Kim, Hung Jeffrey; Bernstein, Joshua G W.
Affiliation
  • Goupell MJ; Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
  • Phatak SA; National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Kolberg E; Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
  • Cleary M; Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
  • Jensen KK; National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Hoa M; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Kim HJ; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Bernstein JGW; National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
Otol Neurotol ; 43(6): 666-675, 2022 07 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35761459
ABSTRACT

HYPOTHESIS:

Bilateral cochlear-implant (BI-CI) users will have a range of interaural insertion-depth mismatch because of different array placement or characteristics. Mismatch will be larger for electrodes located near the apex or outside scala tympani, or for arrays that are a mix of precurved and straight types.

BACKGROUND:

Brainstem superior olivary-complex neurons are exquisitely sensitive to interaural-difference cues for sound localization. Because these neurons rely on interaurally place-of-stimulation-matched inputs, interaural insertion-depth or scalar-location differences for BI-CI users could cause interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch that impairs binaural abilities.

METHODS:

Insertion depths and scalar locations were calculated from temporal-bone computed-tomography scans for 107 BI-CI users (27 Advanced Bionics, 62 Cochlear, 18 MED-EL).

RESULTS:

Median interaural insertion-depth mismatch was 23.4 degrees or 1.3 mm. Mismatch in the estimated clinically relevant range expected to impair binaural processing (>75 degrees or 3 mm) occurred for 13 to 19% of electrode pairs overall, and for at least three electrode pairs for 23 to 37% of subjects. There was a significant three-way interaction between insertion depth, scalar location, and array type. Interaural insertion-depth mismatch was largest for apical electrodes, for electrode pairs in two different scala, and for arrays that were both-precurved.

CONCLUSION:

Average BI-CI interaural insertion-depth mismatch was small; however, large interaural insertion-depth mismatch-with the potential to degrade spatial hearing-occurred frequently enough to warrant attention. For new BICI users, improved surgical techniques to avoid interaural insertion-depth and scalar mismatch are recommended. For existing BI-CI users with interaural insertion-depth mismatch, interaural alignment of clinical frequency tables might reduce negative spatial-hearing consequences.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sound Localization / Cochlear Implants / Cochlear Implantation Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Otol Neurotol Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sound Localization / Cochlear Implants / Cochlear Implantation Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Otol Neurotol Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article