Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Four-Hour Fasting for Semifluids and 2-Hour Fasting for Water Improves the Patient Experience of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cai, Meng-Xi; Gao, Ye; Li, Li; Feng, Wen; Wang, Yi-Lin; Li, Zhao-Shen; Xin, Lei; Wang, Luo-Wei.
Affiliation
  • Cai MX; Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
  • Gao Y; National Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System, Shanghai, China.
  • Li L; Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
  • Feng W; National Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang YL; Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
  • Li ZS; Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
  • Xin L; Georgetown Preparatory School, North Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Wang LW; Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Gut Liver ; 17(3): 382-388, 2023 05 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36148578
Background/Aims: We aimed to investigate the comfort, safety, and endoscopic visibility during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) afforded by a modified 4-hour semifluid and 2-hour water ("4+2") fasting protocol. Methods: In this parallel group, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial, outpatients undergoing unsedated diagnostic EGD from 10:30 AM to 12:00 PM were randomly assigned to either a "4+2" protocol group or a conventional fasting group. The participants' comfort during the fasting period and procedure was measured using the visual analog scale, and mucosal visibility was measured by endoscopists using the total visibility score. Satisfaction was defined as a visual analog scale score of ≤3. The primary outcome was the participants' comfort during fasting. Results: One hundred and six and 108 participants were randomized to the "4+2" protocol and control groups, respectively. Participants' comfort before EGD was significantly higher in the "4+2" protocol group measured by both the proportion of satisfaction (86.8% vs 63.9%, p=0.002) and the visual analog scale score (median [interquartile range]: 1.0 [1.0-2.0] vs 3.0 [1.0-4.0], p<0.001). The proportion of satisfaction during EGD also significantly improved (59.4% vs 45.4%, p=0.039) in the "4+2" protocol group. The total visibility score was unaffected by the fasting protocol (5.0 [4.0-5.0] vs 4.0 [4.0-5.0], p=0.266). No adverse events were observed during the study. Conclusions: The "4+2" protocol was more comfortable and provided equal mucosal visibility and safety compared with conventional fasting for unsedated EGD.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Endoscopy, Digestive System / Fasting Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Gut Liver Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Endoscopy, Digestive System / Fasting Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Gut Liver Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: