Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Benign descriptors and ADNEX in two-step strategy to estimate risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors: retrospective validation in IOTA5 multicenter cohort.
Landolfo, C; Bourne, T; Froyman, W; Van Calster, B; Ceusters, J; Testa, A C; Wynants, L; Sladkevicius, P; Van Holsbeke, C; Domali, E; Fruscio, R; Epstein, E; Franchi, D; Kudla, M J; Chiappa, V; Alcazar, J L; Leone, F P G; Buonomo, F; Coccia, M E; Guerriero, S; Deo, N; Jokubkiene, L; Savelli, L; Fischerova, D; Czekierdowski, A; Kaijser, J; Coosemans, A; Scambia, G; Vergote, I; Timmerman, D; Valentin, L.
Affiliation
  • Landolfo C; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Bourne T; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Froyman W; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Van Calster B; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Ceusters J; Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Testa AC; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Wynants L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Sladkevicius P; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Van Holsbeke C; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Domali E; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Fruscio R; Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Epstein E; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Franchi D; Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
  • Kudla MJ; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Chiappa V; Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Alcazar JL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Leone FPG; Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Buonomo F; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
  • Coccia ME; First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Guerriero S; Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
  • Deo N; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Jokubkiene L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Savelli L; Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Fischerova D; Department of Perinatology and Oncological Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
  • Czekierdowski A; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Kaijser J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Coosemans A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Institute L. Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Scambia G; Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy.
  • Vergote I; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Timmerman D; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Cagliari, Italy.
  • Valentin L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Whipps Cross Hospital, London, UK.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 61(2): 231-242, 2023 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36178788
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Previous work has suggested that the ultrasound-based benign simple descriptors (BDs) can reliably exclude malignancy in a large proportion of women presenting with an adnexal mass. This study aimed to validate a modified version of the BDs and to validate a two-step strategy to estimate the risk of malignancy, in which the modified BDs are followed by the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model if modified BDs do not apply.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective analysis using data from the 2-year interim analysis of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Phase-5 study, in which consecutive patients with at least one adnexal mass were recruited irrespective of subsequent management (conservative or surgery). The main outcome was classification of tumors as benign or malignant, based on histology or on clinical and ultrasound information during 1 year of follow-up. Multiple imputation was used when outcome based on follow-up was uncertain according to predefined criteria.

RESULTS:

A total of 8519 patients were recruited at 36 centers between 2012 and 2015. We excluded patients who were already in follow-up at recruitment and all patients from 19 centers that did not fulfil our criteria for good-quality surgical and follow-up data, leaving 4905 patients across 17 centers for statistical analysis. Overall, 3441 (70%) tumors were benign, 978 (20%) malignant and 486 (10%) uncertain. The modified BDs were applicable in 1798/4905 (37%) tumors, of which 1786 (99.3%) were benign. The two-step strategy based on ADNEX without CA125 had an area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96). The risk of malignancy was slightly underestimated, but calibration varied between centers. A sensitivity analysis in which we expanded the definition of uncertain outcome resulted in 1419 (29%) tumors with uncertain outcome and an AUC of the two-step strategy without CA125 of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95).

CONCLUSION:

A large proportion of adnexal masses can be classified as benign by the modified BDs. For the remaining masses, the ADNEX model can be used to estimate the risk of malignancy. This two-step strategy is convenient for clinical use. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Neoplasms / Adnexal Diseases Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Neoplasms / Adnexal Diseases Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: