Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic accuracy of clinically applied nanoparticle-based biosensors at detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA and surface proteins in pharyngeal swabs compared to RT-PCR as a reference test.
Shirvaliloo, Milad; Sheervalilou, Roghayeh; Ahmadpour, Ehsan; Safiri, Saeid; Bannazadeh Baghi, Hossein.
Affiliation
  • Shirvaliloo M; Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
  • Sheervalilou R; Future Science Group, Unitec House, 2 Albert Place, London, N3 1QB, UK.
  • Ahmadpour E; Pharmacology Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
  • Safiri S; Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
  • Bannazadeh Baghi H; Department of Parasitology and Mycology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Expert Rev Mol Diagn ; 22(9): 881-894, 2022 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36224104
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Nanoparticle-based biosensors (NPBs) are point-of-care diagnostic platforms that can be used for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with high accuracy. AREAS COVERED EBSCOhost Web, Embase, ProQuest, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and WHO Global Literature on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) were searched for relevant records published from 1 November 2019 to 30 April 2022. Records reporting original data on the accuracy of clinically applied nanoparticle-based biosensors at detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA and surface proteins from pharyngeal swab specimens were considered. Findings were reported based on the PRISMA 2020 statement. The QUADAS-2 tool was used for assessment of quality and risk of bias among the included studies. EXPERT OPINION A total of 50 relevant records were identified, of which 13 were included. The included studies explored the diagnostic performance of 13 clinically applied distinct nanoparticle-based biosensors in a total of 789 pharyngeal swabs collected from 376 COVID-19 patients and 413 otherwise healthy individuals. The mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 97.07%, 94.43%, and 96.91%, respectively, in comparison to RT-qPCR as the reference test. Considering their ease-of-operation, portability, low-cost manufacturing, NPBs could be considered suitable candidate diagnostic platforms for substituting RT-qPCR.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biosensing Techniques / Nanoparticles / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Expert Rev Mol Diagn Journal subject: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biosensing Techniques / Nanoparticles / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Expert Rev Mol Diagn Journal subject: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: