Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance Evaluation of Bruker Biotyper, ASTA MicroIDSys, and VITEK-MS and Three Extraction Methods for Filamentous Fungal Identification in Clinical Laboratories.
Choi, Yoojeong; Kim, Daewon; Choe, Kye Won; Lee, Hyukmin; Kim, Jae-Seok; Ahn, Jeong-Yeal; Lee, Mi-Kyung.
Affiliation
  • Choi Y; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chung-Ang Universitygrid.254224.7 College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim D; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Centergrid.411653.4, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Choe KW; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chung-Ang Universitygrid.254224.7 College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee H; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JS; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Ahn JY; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Centergrid.411653.4, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee MK; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chung-Ang Universitygrid.254224.7 College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Microbiol ; 60(11): e0081222, 2022 11 16.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36286489
Filamentous fungi are a major cause of life-threatening infections in immunocompromised patients; thus, rapid and accurate identification is critical. Filamentous fungal identification by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been demonstrated with high sensitivity and reproducibility; however, its wider application has been limited in clinical laboratories because of practical challenges such as database availability or lack of standardization. In this study, we compared the performance of the Bruker Biotyper, ASTA MicroIDSys, and Vitek MS for 84 clinical filamentous fungal isolates. Moreover, the sensitivity of three independent sample preparation methods (direct, on plate, in tube) was compared. Bruker Biotyper identified 71.43% (60/84) of isolates correctly (species, genus, or complex/group level). ASTA MicroIDSys and Vitek MS showed accuracy rates of 70.24% (59/84) and 55.95% (47/84), respectively. We found that any difference in sensitivity may be attributed to the database of the systems. In addition, the "in tube" method showed the highest sensitivity among the three methods; however, there was no statistical difference among them. For the broader application of MALDI-TOF MS for filamentous fungal identification, further studies from multiple perspectives are required.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Clinical Laboratory Services / Laboratories, Clinical Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Clin Microbiol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Clinical Laboratory Services / Laboratories, Clinical Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Clin Microbiol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: