Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of safety and feasibility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of acute stroke.
Arsava, Ethem Murat; Topcuoglu, Mehmet Akif; Ay, Ilknur; Ozdemir, Atilla Ozcan; Gungor, Ibrahim Levent; Togay Isikay, Canan; Nazliel, Bijen; Kozak, Hasan Huseyin; Ozturk, Serefnur; Yilmaz, Ibrahim Arda; Dora, Babur; Ay, Hakan.
Affiliation
  • Arsava EM; Department of Neurology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: arsavam@hacettepe.edu.tr.
  • Topcuoglu MA; Department of Neurology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Ay I; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Ozdemir AO; Department of Neurology, Eskishehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
  • Gungor IL; Department of Neurology, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
  • Togay Isikay C; Department of Neurology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Nazliel B; Department of Neurology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kozak HH; Department of Neurology, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
  • Ozturk S; Department of Neurology, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
  • Yilmaz IA; Department of Neurology, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.
  • Dora B; Department of Neurology, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
  • Ay H; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Brain Stimul ; 15(6): 1467-1474, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36356829
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) using a hand-held stimulator placed on the neck is an FDA-approved treatment for primary headache disorders. The safety of nVNS is unknown in stroke patients.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the safety and feasibility of nVNS for the acute treatment of stroke.

METHODS:

TR-VENUS (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03733431) was a randomized, sham-controlled, open-label, multicenter trial conducted in patients with acute ischemic stroke (IS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Patients were randomly assigned to standard-dose nVNS, high-dose nVNS, or sham stimulation. The primary endpoint was a composite safety outcome defined as bradycardia or reduction in mean arterial blood pressure during treatment or progression of neurological or death within 24 h of treatment. The feasibility endpoints were the proportion of eligible subjects receiving nVNS within 6 h of symptom onset and the proportion completing all pre-specified treatment doses. Efficacy assessments included infarct growth from baseline to 24 h after treatment.

RESULTS:

Sixty-nine patients (61 IS, 8 ICH) completed the study. The composite safety outcome was achieved in 32.0% in sham and 47.7% in nVNS group (p = 0.203). Treatment was initiated in all but two randomized patients. All dosed subjects received 100% of prespecified stimulations. A non-significant reduction in infarct growth was observed in the high-dose nVNS group (184.2% in sham vs. 63.3% in high-dose nVNS; p = 0.109).

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of this study suggest that nVNS may be safe and feasible in the setting of acute stroke. These findings support further development of nVNS as a potential treatment for acute ischemic stroke.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stroke / Vagus Nerve Stimulation / Ischemic Stroke Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Brain Stimul Journal subject: CEREBRO Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stroke / Vagus Nerve Stimulation / Ischemic Stroke Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Brain Stimul Journal subject: CEREBRO Year: 2022 Document type: Article
...