Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Among Different Fixed-Dose Combinations of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists and Long-Acting ß2-Agonists in Patients With COPD.
Weng, Ching-Fu; Wu, Chien-Chih; Wu, Mei-Hsuan; Lin, Fang-Ju.
Affiliation
  • Weng CF; Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hsinchu Cathay General Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
  • Wu CC; Department of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Wu MH; Teaching and Research Center, Hsinchu Cathay General Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan; Precision Medicine Ph.D. Program, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
  • Lin FJ; Department of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: fjilin@ntu.e
Chest ; 163(4): 799-814, 2023 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36442662
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Researchers have yet to obtain conclusive evidence differentiating among fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting ß2-agonists (LABAs) for COPD in terms of real-world clinical outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION What are the differences between available LAMA/LABA FDCs in the risk of acute exacerbation (AE) and cardiovascular events? STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS:

This retrospective cohort study based on a national insurance claims database included patients with COPD ≥ 40 years of age who were newly prescribed glycopyrronium (GLY)/indacaterol (IND), umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI), or tiotropium (TIO)/olodaterol (OLO) FDC between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019. Propensity score matching and Cox regression models were used to compare outcomes of AE and cardiovascular events associated with LAMA/LABA FDC treatment.

RESULTS:

Among the 44,498 patients identified and included, 15,586 received GLY/IND, 20,460 received UMEC/VI, and 8,452 received TIO/OLO. Baseline characteristics were well balanced after 11 matching of UMEC/VI and GLY/IND, 21 matching of UMEC/VI and TIO/OLO, and 21 matching of GLY/IND and TIO/OLO. Risk of severe AE was lower among patients treated with UMEC/VI or GLY/IND than among those who received TIO/OLO (UMEC/VI vs TIO/OLO 17.85 vs 29.32 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84; GLY/IND vs TIO/OLO 15.54 vs 25.53 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88). In addition, GLY/IND users tended to have a lower risk of cardiovascular events than TIO/OLO users, but the difference dissipated when restricting follow up to a shorter duration.

INTERPRETATION:

Our results revealed that the risk of severe AE was lower among patients with COPD receiving UMEC/VI or GLY/IND than among those receiving TIO/OLO, whereas the incidence of cardiovascular events was similar across groups but was slightly lower in GLY/IND users when compared with TIO/OLO users. Further research will be required to confirm these findings.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiovascular Diseases / Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Chest Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiovascular Diseases / Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Chest Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: