Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survival update of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma in the OpACIN and OpACIN-neo trials.
Versluis, J M; Menzies, A M; Sikorska, K; Rozeman, E A; Saw, R P M; van Houdt, W J; Eriksson, H; Klop, W M C; Ch'ng, S; van Thienen, J V; Mallo, H; Gonzalez, M; Torres Acosta, A; Grijpink-Ongering, L G; van der Wal, A; Bruining, A; van de Wiel, B A; Scolyer, R A; Haanen, J B A G; Schumacher, T N; van Akkooi, A C J; Long, G V; Blank, C U.
Affiliation
  • Versluis JM; Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Menzies AM; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia.
  • Sikorska K; Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Rozeman EA; Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Saw RPM; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, Sydney; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
  • van Houdt WJ; Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Eriksson H; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Department of Oncology/Skin Cancer Center, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Klop WMC; Departments of, Head and Neck Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Ch'ng S; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, Sydney; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
  • van Thienen JV; Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Mallo H; Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Gonzalez M; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney.
  • Torres Acosta A; Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Grijpink-Ongering LG; Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van der Wal A; Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bruining A; Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van de Wiel BA; Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Scolyer RA; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, S
  • Haanen JBAG; Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
  • Schumacher TN; Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
  • van Akkooi ACJ; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
  • Long GV; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Blank CU; Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: c.blank@nk
Ann Oncol ; 34(4): 420-430, 2023 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36681299
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab has yielded high response rates in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma. These response rates translated to high short-term survival rates. However, data on long-term survival and disease recurrence are lacking. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

In OpACIN, 20 patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma were randomized to ipilimumab 3 mg/kg plus nivolumab 1 mg/kg q3w four cycles of adjuvant or split two cycles of neoadjuvant and two adjuvant. In OpACIN-neo, 86 patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma were randomized to arm A (2× ipilimumab 3 mg/kg plus nivolumab 1 mg/kg q3w; n = 30), arm B (2× ipilimumab 1 mg/kg plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg q3w; n = 30), or arm C (2× ipilimumab 3 mg/kg q3w plus 2× nivolumab 3 mg/kg q2w; n = 26) followed by surgery.

RESULTS:

The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached in either trial. After a median follow-up of 69 months for OpACIN, 1/7 patients with a pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy had disease recurrence. The estimated 5-year RFS and OS rates for the neoadjuvant arm were 70% and 90% versus 60% and 70% for the adjuvant arm. After a median follow-up of 47 months for OpACIN-neo, the estimated 3-year RFS and OS rates were 82% and 92%, respectively. The estimated 3-year RFS rate for OpACIN-neo was 95% for patients with a pathologic response versus 37% for patients without a pathologic response (P < 0.001). In multiple regression analyses, pathologic response was the strongest predictor of disease recurrence. Of the 12 patients with distant disease recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy, 5 responded to subsequent anti-PD-1 and 8 to targeted therapy, although 7 patients showed progression after the initial response.

CONCLUSIONS:

Updated data confirm the high survival rates after neoadjuvant combination checkpoint inhibition in macroscopic stage III melanoma, especially for patients with a pathologic response. Pathologic response is the strongest surrogate marker for long-term outcome.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Nivolumab / Melanoma Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Ann Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Nivolumab / Melanoma Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Ann Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: