Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The analgesic effect of lumbar sympathetic ganglion block in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.
Lee, Jin Young; Sim, Woo Seog; Kim, Jiyoung; Yang, Sungwon; Ro, Hojun; Kim, Chang Jae; Kim, Sung Un; Park, Hue Jung.
Affiliation
  • Lee JY; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Sim WS; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim J; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Yang S; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Ro H; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim CJ; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim SU; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park HJ; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 999655, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36714111
ABSTRACT

Background:

Persistent or recurrent lumbosacral pain is a common symptom after spinal surgery. Several interventions have been introduced for failed back surgery syndrome; however, their clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness are insufficient. Sympathetic ganglion block has been selected for pain associated with the sympathetic nervous system. In this study, we compared pain and quality of life in patients with failed back surgery syndrome who responded and did not respond to lumbar sympathetic ganglion block.

Methods:

We included 84 patients diagnosed with failed back surgery syndrome who had lumbosacral pain and underwent lumbar sympathetic ganglion block between January 2020 and April 2021. The patients' data were retrospectively analyzed; clinical outcomes were assessed before (T0), 1 week after (T1), and 4 weeks after (T4) lumbar sympathetic ganglion block. Based on the pain difference from T0 to T1, we categorized patients into two groups patients with ≥ 50% pain reduction (responder group) and patients with < 50% pain reduction (non-responder group). Demographic, clinical, surgical, and fluoroscopic data were evaluated and compared. The primary outcome was pain scores and the EuroQol-5D score from T0 to T4.

Results:

Among the 84 patients analyzed, 41 (48.8%) experienced ≥ 50% pain reduction at 1 week after lumbar sympathetic ganglion block. Lumbar sympathetic ganglion block significantly improved pain at T1 and T4 compared to T0 in both groups. Lumbar sympathetic ganglion block improved the EuroQol-5D score at T1 compared to T0 in the responder group. The responder group had a significant decrease in pain at T1 from T0 and T4 from T0 and a significant decrease in the EuroQol-5D score at T1 from T0 compared with the non-responder group. Coldness of the leg over time did not differ between the groups. No serious adverse events occurred in either of the groups.

Conclusion:

Lumbar sympathetic ganglion block may improve pain at 1 and 4 weeks in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Patients with ≥ 50% pain reduction at 1 week showed simultaneous improvement in quality of life and pain reduction at 4 weeks. Clinical trial registration https//cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index/index.do, identifier KCT0007236.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Year: 2022 Document type: Article
...