Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Synthesis and biological evaluation of ruthenium complexes containing phenylseleny against Gram-positive bacterial infection by damage membrane integrity and avoid drug-resistance.
Huang, Hai-Yan; Wang, Qian; Zhang, Chun-Yan; Chen, Zi-Xiang; Wang, Jin-Tao; Liao, Xiang-Wen; Yu, Ru-Jian; Xiong, Yan-Shi.
Affiliation
  • Huang HY; School of Pharmacy, Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330013, China.
  • Wang Q; Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 201500, China.
  • Zhang CY; School of Pharmacy, Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330013, China.
  • Chen ZX; School of Pharmacy, Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330013, China.
  • Wang JT; School of Pharmacy, Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330013, China.
  • Liao XW; School of Pharmacy, Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330013, China.
  • Yu RJ; School of Pharmacy, Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330013, China.
  • Xiong YS; School of Pharmacy, Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330013, China. Electronic address: xiongys1214@163.com.
J Inorg Biochem ; 242: 112175, 2023 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36898296
ABSTRACT
Compounds modified with selenium atom as potential antibacterial agents have been exploited to combat the nondrug-resistant bacterial infection. In this study, we designed and synthesized four ruthenium complexes retouching of selenium-ether. Fortunately, those four ruthenium complexes shown excellent antibacterial bioactive (MIC 1.56-6.25 µg/mL) against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and the most active complex Ru(II)-4 could kill S. aureus by targeting the membrane integrity and avoid the bacteria to evolve drug resistance. Moreover, Ru(II)-4 was found to significantly inhibit the formation of biofilms and biofilm eradicate capacity. In toxicity experiments, Ru(II)-4 exhibited poor hemolysis and low mammalian toxicity. To illustrate the antibacterial mechanism we conducted scanning electron microscope (SEM), fluorescent staining, membrane rupture and DNA leakage assays. Those results demonstrated that Ru(II)-4 could destroy the integrity of bacterial cell membrane. Furthermore, both G. mellonella wax worms infection model and mouse skin infection model were established to evaluate the antibacterial activity of Ru(II)-4 in vivo, the results indicated that Ru(II)-4 was a potential candidate for combating S. aureus infections, and almost non-toxic to mouse tissue. Thus, all the results indicated that introducing selenium-atom into ruthenium compounds were a promising strategy for developing interesting antibacterial agents.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ruthenium / Selenium / Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections / Coordination Complexes Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: J Inorg Biochem Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ruthenium / Selenium / Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections / Coordination Complexes Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: J Inorg Biochem Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: