Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Financial incentives and case management to improve cardiac rehabilitation participation among patients with lower socio-economic status: Rationale and protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Yant, Blair; Kromer, Lisa; Savage, Patrick D; Khadanga, Sherrie; Ades, Philip A; Gaalema, Diann E.
Affiliation
  • Yant B; University of Vermont, United States of America.
  • Kromer L; University of Vermont, United States of America.
  • Savage PD; University of Vermont Medical Center, United States of America.
  • Khadanga S; University of Vermont, United States of America; University of Vermont Medical Center, United States of America.
  • Ades PA; University of Vermont, United States of America; University of Vermont Medical Center, United States of America.
  • Gaalema DE; University of Vermont, United States of America. Electronic address: Diann.Gaalema@med.uvm.edu.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 129: 107174, 2023 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37019181
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Participation in phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with significant decreases in morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, attendance at CR is not optimal and certain populations, such as those with lower-socioeconomic status (SES), are less likely to participate. In order to remedy this disparity we have designed a trial to examine the efficacy of early case management and/or financial incentives for increasing CR participation among lower-SES patients.

METHODS:

We will employ a randomized controlled trial with a sample goal of 209 patients who will be randomized 2333 to either a usual care control, to receive a case manager starting in-hospital, to receive financial incentives for completing CR sessions, or to receive both interventions.

RESULTS:

Treatment conditions will be compared on attendance at CR and end-of-intervention (four months) improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness, executive function, and health-related quality of life. The primary outcome measures for this project will be number of CR sessions completed and the percentage who complete ≥30 sessions. Secondary outcomes will include improvements in health outcomes by condition, as well as the cost-effectiveness of the intervention with a focus on potential reductions in emergency department visits and hospitalizations. We hypothesize that either intervention will perform better than the control and that the combination of interventions will perform better than either alone.

CONCLUSIONS:

This systematic examination of interventions will allow us to test the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of approaches that have the potential to increase CR participation substantially and significantly improve health outcomes among patients with lower-SES.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiac Rehabilitation Type of study: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality / Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Journal subject: MEDICINA / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiac Rehabilitation Type of study: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality / Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Journal subject: MEDICINA / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: