Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Feasibility and Value of a Focal Therapy Multidisciplinary Tumor Board, Including Radiographic and Pathological Overreads in Refining the Selection for High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer Patients.
Benidir, Tarik; Wood, Andrew; Lone, Zaeem; Schwen, Zeyad; Abouassaly, Robert; Nguyen, Jane; Olivares, Ruben; Weight, Christopher J; Purysko, Andrei S.
Affiliation
  • Benidir T; Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Wood A; Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Lone Z; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Schwen Z; Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Abouassaly R; Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Nguyen J; Cleveland Clinic Pathology Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Olivares R; Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Weight CJ; Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Purysko AS; Cleveland Clinic Imaging Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
Urol Pract ; 10(4): 372-377, 2023 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37103528
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Focal therapy for prostate cancer is increasingly recognized as an acceptable therapeutic option in well-selected men. A focal therapy multidisciplinary tumor board geared toward improving patient selection is a novel concept which has not been reported. We describe our institution's initial experience with a multidisciplinary tumor board for focal therapy and its outcomes in terms of patient selection.

METHODS:

This was a single-center, prospective study of patients referred to a multidisciplinary tumor board. All prostate MRIs were re-reviewed by a single radiologist with >10 years of experience, and the number, size, location, and Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System scores of lesions visible on MRI were recorded and compared to the original report. Outside histopathology, when requested, was also re-reviewed for cancer grade groups and adverse pathological features. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS:

Seventy-four patients were presented at our multidisciplinary tumor board (January-October 2022). Sixty-seven patients were treatment naïve, while 7 had prior radiation±androgen deprivation therapy. MRI overread was performed on all treatment-naïve patients (67/74 [91%]), while pathology overreads were performed on 14/74 (19.9%). Following multidisciplinary tumor board, 19 patients (25.6%) were deemed suitable candidates for focal therapy. A total of 24 patients (35.8%) were not deemed candidates for high intensity focused ultrasound focal therapy based exclusively on findings identified at MRI overread. Pathology re-review changed management for 3/14 patients, with two-thirds being downgraded to grade group 1 disease and opting for active surveillance.

CONCLUSIONS:

Multidisciplinary tumor board for focal therapy is feasible. MRI overread is an essential component of this process and demonstrates significant findings that alter eligibility or management in over a third of patients.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Urol Pract Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Urol Pract Year: 2023 Document type: Article