Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ischemic Preconditioning Improves the Bench-Press Maximal Strength in Resistance-Trained Men.
Rodrigues, Anderson Luiz; Ide, Bernardo N; Sasaki, Jeffer Eidi; DE Oliveira, Donizete Cicero X; DE Oliveira Assumpção, Claudio; Marocolo, Moacir; Mota, Gustavo R.
Affiliation
  • Rodrigues AL; Exercise Science Health and Human Performance Research Group, Department of Sport Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba/MG, Brazil.
  • Ide BN; Exercise Science Health and Human Performance Research Group, Department of Sport Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba/MG, Brazil.
  • Sasaki JE; Exercise Science Health and Human Performance Research Group, Department of Sport Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba/MG, Brazil.
  • DE Oliveira DCX; Exercise Science Health and Human Performance Research Group, Department of Sport Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba/MG, Brazil.
  • DE Oliveira Assumpção C; Exercise Science Health and Human Performance Research Group, Department of Sport Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba/MG, Brazil.
  • Marocolo M; Physiology and Human Performance Research Group, Department of Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora/MG, Brazil.
  • Mota GR; Exercise Science Health and Human Performance Research Group, Department of Sport Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba/MG, Brazil.
Int J Exerc Sci ; 16(4): 217-229, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37113512
ABSTRACT
We investigated whether acute ischemic preconditioning (IPC) would affect upper limb maximal strength performance in resistance-trained men. Using a counterbalanced randomized crossover design, fifteen men (29.9 ± 5.9 yrs.; 86.3 ± 9.6 kg; 8.0 ± 5.0 yrs. resistance training experience) performed one-repetition maximum (1-RM) bench press tests on three different occasions control, 10 min post-IPC or 10 min post-placebo (SHAM). One-way analysis of variance showed that the post-IPC condition increased (P < 0.0001) 1-RM loads compared to both control and post-SHAM (control 113.3 ± 15.9 kg vs. SHAM 113.9 ± 15.8 kg vs. IPC 115.7 ± 15.6 kg), while control and SHAM did not differ (P > 0.05). Individual results showed that 13 participants (~87%) improved their performance post-IPC compared to control, and 11 participants (~73%) performed better post-IPC compared to post-SHAM. Reported session rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was lower (P < 0.0001) post-IPC (8.5 ± 0.6 arb.u) compared to control (9.3 ± 0.5 arb.u) and post-SHAM (9.3 ± 0.5 arb.u). Therefore, we conclude that IPC acutely improves upper limb maximal strength performance and reduces session-RPE in resistance-trained men. These results suggest an acute ergogenic effect of IPC for strength and power sports such as powerlifting.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Language: En Journal: Int J Exerc Sci Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Language: En Journal: Int J Exerc Sci Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: